It has changed childhood behavior, and parenting behavior as well.
I really don't think this is a standard fear of something not understood, it's pretty clear it's affecting people and there should be a change.
But your generation didn't. 70 years of television destroyed the minds of the boomer generation and is responsible for a lot of today's ills, as traditional culture was replaced with manufactured content pumped out for the sole purpose of engagement -- much like social media today, but weaker.
We didn't survive TV, we just got used to and normalized it.
Same thing is happening with smartphones and addictive feeds now.
Some of the same people who say TV clearly didn't hurt us and is normal and OK, are the same who skewer the boomer generation. Don't they ever put two and two together? Of course not, that would take an attention span, which was reduced by TV and is now being finished off by TikTok
I think you can say that of a lot of the social experiments of the 20th century. Was teaching kids to “question authority” and “think for themselves” such a great idea? Maybe that’s why we got so many nutty anti-vaxxers and Alex Jones watching nuts.
Just like with so many other iterations of "X is ruining kids these days", if X fills a void it's probably better to focus on the void instead of X.
Didn't kids get in trouble for staying up to late reading books? Then it was TV. Then it was those damn video games making us all violent. Now it's smart phones?
Like most things, don't abuse it and it's not a problem.
I've certainly noticed a difference with what the kids want to play. Random garbage, daily drops, pay to win. Even the pacing is different.
Is this one different? Certainly, but every new problem is different.
I'm positive we'll figure it out. The world never collapsed when GTA came out.
Part of me reads these no differently than those articles where "nobody wants to work anymore". If you change a few words, you could have written the same piece 100 years ago.
I'm absolutely not saying that it's conclusive proof of the article's position, but I do think it's a powerful data point.
> In many but not all regions, the young are happier than the old. But in North America happiness has fallen so sharply for the young that they are now less happy than the old. By contrast, in the transition countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the young are much happier than the old. In Western Europe as a whole happiness is similar at all ages, while elsewhere it tends to decline over the life cycle (with an occasional upturn for the old).
This seems to be a phenomenon uniquely present in the Anglosphere. I don't think smartphones are the culprit.
What about, for example, the loss (or stagnation, as it is sometime thought of) of culture we've seen since the smartphone? I think it is fair to say that the smartphone – or a closely related technology – is why that has happened. Take music as a prime example: When I was young, you pretty much had to listen to the same music as everyone else as it was very hard to discover anything beyond. The music everyone was listening to defined a culture. These days, with the change in technology, we could very easily never hear the same song. But someone who has never touched a smartphone in their life is not excluded here.
There is quite a bit of evidence to suggest that suicide rates are higher amongst those who don't find a shared identity. Interestingly, youth suicide rates also dropped precipitously during the COVID period. I expect screen time shot through the roof during that phase! But, perhaps, knowing that everyone was dealing with the same COVID experience provided something to identify with.