What the hell. No, Kardwell. We weren't confused. We read your words, understood the implications, and complained. It was because were weren't confused.
"The customers are too stupid to understand." Yeah, that surely must be it.
From the article:
> User content was defined as "the information, text, opinions, messages, comments, audio visual works, motion pictures, photographs, animation, videos, graphics, sounds, music, software, apps, and any other content or material that you or your end users submit, upload, post, host, store, or otherwise make available" using Vultr's resources.
"...that you or your end users... host". Maybe Vultr had nothing but the best intentions, but their legalese was catastrophically bad. If Vultr truly meant well, then the only people confused were their legal team who drafted a ToS that didn't reflect their intent.