Like many of the ideas in the book 1984, turning all the stoplights green at the same time in New York City was probably not possible in the 1960s. It is now.
Retrieving the gold is left as an exercise to the reader.
IMHO: if you want an entertaining movie, watch the 2003 movie. If you're planning a bank heist, the 1969 version is probably more informative. N.B.: I've never done a bank job.
I can't speak for the whole industry, but back when I was part of it, thats how our controllers worked. Admittedly, I don't think New York City was a customer.
“Because some people just want to see the world burn”, unfortunately.
The idea that someone would actually fly two commercial airliners into downtown manhattan to take out the World Trade Center was also pretty unlikely, circa 2000 and 2001.
I suspect many people in HN could whip up mass violence with drones if they wanted to. Luckily the people who can generally have better things to do.
The US and China go to war, over Taiwan say. This would be part of a general attack on the US, and would include things like the power grid, internet infrastructure, and anything else that can be disabled or turned against us.
Terrorists decide that 9/11 wasn't good enough, and they can do 1000x more damage, death and terror from the comfort of their computers.
Extortionists decide to leverage this capability to extort money from car companies.
More targeted killings would be motivated according to your thought.
This is just the top of my head. I'm sure there are others.
Other continues be something like NotPetya, localized cyberwar tactic that hits public internet and runs amuck. But to get from that to critical infra in US, let alone personal autos, is hard to picture.
It just seems like the degree of premeditation involved here would also come to the conclusion, given how over invested we are in our military, that is better to make it seem like the US is perpetually shooting itself in the foot rather than make it seems like the US has been shot. We tend to get all rambunctious when we know it was an attack, better to have us lose the war before we know we're fighting it.
When it comes to remote vehicle access I think you could do more damage carefully over the course of a decade than you could do rashly in a day.
There's no need for Tom Clancy 46-dimensional chess plots that involve hacking the Gibson.
The next time you see your neighbour driving poorly, ask yourself - are they a spy, wrecker, or saboteur? (/s)
Not if they short-sell the car-manufacturer stock first! Granted, that might increase their odds of being caught, but attackers don't have to be wise to be dangerous.
Depending on what can be hacked, another possibility would be a string of suspiciously-smooth thefts.
I mean, it depends on the person pulling the trigger, right? A sociopathic 14 year old from Bogota might not care.