A few thoughts on the DOJ's antitrust case against Apple
birchtree.me
birchtree.me
Had never considered this, great points.
Microsoft traditionally did the OS, and left hardware and apps to others. This led to a huge market for PC hardware, open to true competition. It also led to a really robust market for windows apps, also open to competition.
Love or hate windows, but this greatly benefited computer users and led to a great year over year decline in the cost of computing.
Apple on the other hand has inserted itself to tightly control hardware and software on its platforms (somewhat less on macos). But it is only passably to the benefit of computer/phone/tablet users. It drove the price users were willing to pay for software to zero, and maintained or inflated the price of its hardware year over year.
and the worst part, users don't really have sovereignty over their devices or software. You can't know what your phone is doing. You can't see who it communicates with. And you can't control or opt-out of anything unless apple allows it in the ways apple allows it.
I would like to know what's running on my phone. I'd like to see what apps are doing, who they are communicating with and what they are sending. And I'd like to be able to say no to what I don't like, possibly in a way that apple hates. I'd like to run my own apps, without asking apple for permission, and with no restrictions.
https://genodians.org/nfeske/2024-02-15-fosdem-aftermath
It's definitely not ready as a daily driver yet though (understatement). ;)
Uber has a market cap of $160B. A not-insignificant fraction of Meta’s $1.2T value is derived from Instagram (which was notoriously iPhone-only when it took off like a rocket).
Apple has chosen to toll the specific market of digital goods delivered outside the open web. Even there, much wealth has been built: Before they decided it wasn’t worth the “broker fee”, Netflix was far and away the highest grossing app in the store for years on end.
And as I pointed out, Netflix was for a long time willing to pay a massive aggregate fee (though not 30%, terms of their deal with Apple have not been disclosed).
Also, you may have heard something in the news recently about TikTok.
I don't see how this helps your case. Basically the only way to win on iOS with a new idea is to pay apple, or be big enough that Apple doesn't want to lose your customers. That's a complete non-starter for (heh) startups.
If you really need another example, see online sports betting. Now legal in most states, and Apple takes 0%.
There are lesser known examples of policy based lockouts like mobiussync for syncthing being held back by background scheduling limitations or that bit torrent software isn’t allowed.
Then also there’s the issue of control center only allowing Apple builtin (unchangeable) default app controls… when interestingly a number of these have become more than just preinstalled conveniences but are now also fronting funnels to an iCloud subscription.
"A lot of this feels yucky, and none of the things mentioned in the case should be a surprise to anyone who has been following the Apple space for years. That said, it’s one thing for me to blog that Apple should change something, it’s another thing when the DOJ says it’s illegal. I think the DOJ has an uphill battle in winning this case..."
TFTFY