I know it's usually not accurate to call something a hit-piece, but this is a hit piece, and it's frankly dishonest.

Given that the author is a visiting fellow at Yale Law School's Information Society Project, it's hard to accept that they reasonably don't know this.

Case in point:

"Within seconds the Vision Pro had photographed more of my apartment and body than my laptop saw over the decade I've had it."

A statement that is simply untrue by any reasonable interpretation.