I recall something like 7% of students going on into research, meaning that they weren't even trying to meet the needs of 93% of their students.
I recall something like 7% of students going on into research, meaning that they weren't even trying to meet the needs of 93% of their students.
With a good theoretical background in CS, most of what you need for the industry can be learned more easily throughout your career.
That universities are not dedicated to teaching how to be an immediately productive economical actor makes sense. That's of course assuming you don't have to take on 300k of debt to get a degree...
I have always had programming jobs (job title: software engineer) that required the 'researcher' mindset. We didn't mind teaching them our stack or even good coding practice, but if they didn't have the 'explorative/innovative mind' of a 'researcher', we could never train them up to the level they needed to be.
They need to start teaching software engineering, not just computer science. And 93% of their CS students need to switch.
University was meant to be the destination of future scholars.
I think it would have been clearer to just stick with "good fit for industry".