It was somebody on their phone, not signed in, and all they did was change "is" to "was" in two places, leaving the single word edit summary "was". But thank you for imagining Wikipedians are so professional.
Not sure I understand the snarky turn at the end there but I imagine I'm just lacking whatever context you have! No problem :)
For what it's worth I've popped an upvote on your comment and will go out of my way to double check snark is actually snark before replying to things in future.
Sorry for the misfiring assumption!