Windows 98 Icons (2015)
win98icons.alexmeub.com
win98icons.alexmeub.com
EDIT: Adding as postscript: Is there anything similar which would come close to Bluecurve today? TIA if there is anything in reader's minds.
1. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/GNOME_2....
2. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/Fedora-y...
I even skinned my XP with theme that was most close to the original - sadly, on Windows it was always a hard task and in few spots GUI was falling back into 9x widgets, not mention the usual problem with icons and other resource files.
Exactly my experience. The first time I installed Linux when I was around 15 I was surprised how modern, "sharp" and professional everything looked compared to Windows XP.
(The default Windows XP design was really the beginning of a downward curve for Windows designs. Windows 98 looked like a tool, Windows XP looked like a toy, which is a shame because Windows XP was a vastly superior (and in my experience ridiculously stable) OS. I always used the "classic" Win 98 design).
Hence it was and still sometimes is being called Fisher-Price. Microsoft had to drastically change their flagship project so it would be attractive against OSX. The Whistler's Watercolor theme that existed during beta period was good but wasn't enough for the final release [1][2].
That period was full of candy/toys/glass/acrylic GUIs. Apple had Aqua, and Linux distros had Keramik and Plastik window/widget themes with Crystal icons in KDE. The latter become preserved in the Trinity envirnoment [1] since KDE moved to Plasma in version 4, which looked to me like a Vista's Aero step-sister [3]
[1] - https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/images/7/77/Windows_Whistle...
[2] - https://guidebookgallery.org/pics/gui/desktop/full/whistler2...
[3] - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/KD...
Aqua is (was†) Mac OS X, Mac OS 8~9 was Platinum.
† While the current design continues to be called "Aqua" I personally consider the last iteration of Aqua to be Mavericks. While Cheetah, Puma, and Jaguar had the filling lines, Panther and Tiger had brushed metal, and the brief touchdown with skeuomorphism in Lion and Mountain Lion, they overall consistently carried the colourful glossy-watery "lick-it-candy" theme throughout - including icons - all the way, until Yosemite happens... Then it gets all silky with frosted glass, desaturated colours, and muted gradients, which just does not have the Aqua feel to me.
https://www.mailvita.com/kb/list-of-all-versions-of-mac-os-f...
The JonnyIvification of Apple interfaces starting with Mavericks & iOS7. Although it has grown on us, the flat designs were very jarring back then. Our brains were so used to pill shaped buttons & then everything felt flat
The main thing about windows icon (and overall) "design" as can clearly be seen in TLA is how ridiculously inconsistent it all is. Perspective, shape, colors, level-of-detail, layout, style. It's mind boggling that no-one hit the brakes in Redmond, hired an intern, just to polish out the worst offenders.
I mean, I get the complexity and business flows in place that produce this terrible mess. But in the end the software is packaged as one thing.
Is it their stronghold on the market (monopoly) that makes they can afford not to care? Or did their customers really not care (I mean, I did, and it was one of many things that made me fall in love with Linux back then)
A camcorder, a floppy disk, a CD-ROM, a film (for a camera), maybe even the fountain pen.
All of which I can recognise, but all of which will probably leave my daughters baffled if I were to ask them what it was...
It is interesting how iconography links to timeless design. Function and appearance have a way of coexisting in good design so the "idea" of something gets into semiotics.
Disk storage is a timeless concept. It's absent now but will no doubt return in some new guise on the next wave of materials science and storage tech.
The pen is timeless too.
Perhaps the weird one is the classic phone handset. My daughter who never saw one except maybe on a cartoon, instantly knew what to do with an old 1970s rotary I was hacking. The design "reaches out" and suggests its usage. Partly that's our monkey brains that sees tools and uses in everything.
How did your daughter immediately grasp those non-obvious, hidden concepts?
I'm convinced she saw it in a cartoon like Dora or Fireman Sam. But didn't hesitate to pick up the handset and put it to her ear.
EDIT:
Damnit I just had a flash of insight... thanks for the memory jolt.
As a baby she had a modern version of something like this [0] (hope the image loads for you). They still make them almost the same. It's a "walker/activity toy" with a rotary dial that made a sound and a phone handset.
[0] https://i.pinimg.com/originals/fd/28/21/fd28216d19251b2d7895...
That's such an interesting point. Having grown up with landlines (DTMF and initially pulse-dialing ones), I was trying to do the very opposite with my mobile phone just yesterday! The cellular connection was atrocious, with my calls being rejected or silenced regardless of the carrier. I attempted to start the call with an empty number so that I could hear that the dialing tones were correct myself - of course, it didn't let me. I don't suppose the dialing stage of a modern mobile phone is analogue anyway, is it?
I think we have precedent in the iconography of specialist occupations that have already existed in preindustrial times. The various brewing implements that adorn the labels of many breweries, the geometry implements that now only live on in freemasonry.. They all have names, but those names are lost to everybody but those who enjoy accumulating knowledge of old-timey things. Baffled, yes. But the world already is full of that kind of echoes from the past, it's not like someone is confused by them. Those who might consider a box of 3.5" a box of old save icons grew up with those save icons, it's the world they know.
This all probably is very questionable from the legal point of view but I have courage to hope nobody is going to care busting us as long as we only use these in small personal projects just a handful of people sees.
I even hope there will one day be a Dall-E-like neural network which would take a prompt and produce icons in Windows 3.x/98 style in any resolution you might need (i.e. up to whatever it takes to make a big icon on a Retina display).
Long live vapourwave! :-)
And when I these I don't mean only the specific apps and file types logos but also the icons which could be placed on the toolbars, icons used in the dialogs etc.
A good icon seems like a good invention, something that has always existed, speaks to you directly and seems to have been recalled rather than created for the first time.
I think the nostalgia over some retro OSes is warranted.
There's a working archive of them here: http://www.effectgames.com/demos/canvascycle/
They're real masterpieces. 256 colour pixel art, with some colours palette cycling to create animation by using the right pixels in the right place. But then he also changes the palette to create different times of day.
Some of them have rain or snow and the particles appear to move smoothly over the various parts of the background. Carefully switching the palette index not just for each bit of movement but also using a different section of the palette each time a snowflake transitions to pass over a different-coloured background layer.
There's a pool with a shimmering reflection! There's an animated aurora borealis! There's underwater scenes, oceans, fires, all animated via fixed palette cycling only!
And none of it looks forced, it all looks beautifully natural. You can open up the "Options" tab to see the palette and hover over the colours to see where they're used.
I have seen these long ago, thanks a ton for the working link.
Considering it is not some modern trendy pixel dithering, I can hardly imagine the amount of work required to create this art back then.
data:text/html;verbatim,<body>
<script>document.body.style.setProperty('--dpr',devicePixelRatio);</script>
<img src="https://win98icons.alexmeub.com/css_sprites.png"
style="image-rendering:crisp-edges;
background-color:grey;
width:calc(1/var(--dpr)*2168px*5);">
It forces it to map to physical device display pixels and use nearest-neighbour scaling; the last number there sets it to display each source pixel as 5×5 square in your browser's window.Here is better cross-browser compatible version with sharp "pixels" for Chrome/Edge:
data:text/html;verbatim,<body>
<script>document.body.style.setProperty('--dpr',devicePixelRatio);</script>
<img src="https://win98icons.alexmeub.com/css_sprites.png"
style="background-color:grey;
image-rendering:-webkit-optimize-contrast;
image-rendering:pixelated;
image-rendering:crisp-edges;
width:calc(1/var(--dpr)*2168px*5);">
Sorry for the inconvenience!(And welcome to peculiarities of front-end web development. It is the year 2024 and there are still CSS level 3 modules that are not implemented reliably in latest browser versions, apparently.)
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/image-rende...
Now all I want is the Windows 98 look and feel back, when icons and user controls were clear and legible and consistent and you could drag a window from anywhere on a title bar.
I've seen some legacy fixed size games in tiny windows. If hate the os to be like that. My vision isn't good enough.
Hey, Chicago95! My favorite XFCE theme!
Then finally Windows 98 updates the shell to actually support full-color icons, and this was a big deal. I think Microsoft Plus for Windows 95 also added this feature as well.
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop\WindowsMetrics]
"Shell Icon BPP"="16"
"24" and "32" should also work as values if you have a capable adapter+display combination.Thanks for the trip down memory lane too. It’s been years since I’ve last thought about moricons.dll. Possibly even decades.
For those who haven’t heard of it: https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/6705/what...
Edit: looks like it is still available https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moricons.dll
It is kind of amusing how the printer icons when I come to think about it are actually visually referencing 10BASE2/10BASE5.
Like 4 nearly identical IE icons. 6 very similar PC+Keyboard icons. 6 very similar trashes?
[edit] Apparently the "cool" ones are from 98 beta builds (1351-1569) that didn't end up being ever used in actual release.
Windows 98 Icons are Great (2015)
It's probably one thing I actually like more about the XP or Linux (KDE) iconset.
- Some of them are the same icon but the slightly more modern counterpart (ie where more colours were supported
- Some of them are the same icon but in different states (eg empty recycle bin vs non-empty recycle bin)
- Some are actually intended to be used as crude animations (eg the 4 icons of magnifying glass over the computer are actually just 4 frames of an animation)
- Plus pixels were "bigger" back then so you had to do more with less. But thankfully subtle changes were also more noticeable (again, because pixels were "bigger")
... originally because someone needed the Excel 95 icon as a Slack emoji, naturally.
apple and linux fonts/icons always looked much nicer to me
You could? To me, the jump from Windows 98 to Windows 2000 was MASSIVE when it comes to readability.