This is some mad scientist stuff. Great work.
This is some mad scientist stuff. Great work.
Why do you say that? It's a very simple and tiny language that you can learn in an afternoon. Far from the utter complexity of modern things. It's barely more complicated than a programmable calculator. Certainly simpler, cleaner, and arguably more powerful than svg graphics.
You don't even need to read any manual to guess what this example program does:
100 100 moveto
200 300 lineto
strokeVery cool stuff, but not what I do day to day, so it’s a bit intimidating at first.
Is there an implicit bounding box? How large is it? Does x or y go first in the parameters?
> Certainly simpler, cleaner, and arguably more powerful than svg graphics.
Much more powerful, I agree. Some might even say a bit too powerful for a graphics description language, halting problem and all.
Although it would, at times, go wrong there are very few things to this day that do impress me more than typing this (admire my "useless use of cat" btw):
... $ cat tiger.ps | netcat 192.168.0.78 9100
And see my HP LaserJet 4M+ (speaking PostScript natively) start printing.Yeah, yeah, yeah, I do have a SOHO and a modern printer/scanner at home and it can do more stuff.
But the elegance of netcat'ing a PostScript file to a printer and seeing it print without needing any driver nor any configuration whatsoever [1] was quite something.
It was simpler indeed and it was elegant and it did feel like magic.
Now it wasn't fun if you printed many pages and suddenly it started printing garbage but still...
[1] you had to configure the printer itself to get an IP, but that was done on the printer itself
I particularly like chapter 14 where you implement 3d shader in postscript.
I found PostScript to be one of those things where something "clicks" after a while, and I really started to appreciate the elegance and simplicity. The hardest part is the mental gymnastics required to track what's on the stack and in what order!