> in question is obviously not CSAM as you can see in the Bluesky thread
Wouldn't go as far as "obviously". I mean, I get it's not meant to be, but I hope you're able to see it's... playing with the threshold?
Wouldn't go as far as "obviously". I mean, I get it's not meant to be, but I hope you're able to see it's... playing with the threshold?
But after reviewing your link, I would say even more questionable.
Mid teens?
Meanwhile a cartoon illustration of two girls kissing is posted on a Fediverse instance with less than a hundred users, dedicated as a safe space for trans women, and it's immediately Threatening E-Mail O'clock.
Their "out" is that they got complaints, which is honestly even more hilarious, because are we going to pretend they got more complaints about a teeny-tiny Sharkey instance than Kiwi fucking Farms?
Loli porn is disgusting and the people who view it are unequivocally pedophiles, but this is not that. It's weird, but it shouldn't be in the realm of such a takedown.
It is almost certainly cloudflares policy that they will not make judgements like this. They will just take down any content if someone complains about it.
Think about it - if they paid an employee to look at the content to decide legal/not legal, they would be exposing that employee to CSAM. That's illegal and they'd get sued for it.
Which is why they probably have no human involvement in the decision-making, and lots of legal things are taken down as a result.