1. Some people are mad that Stable Diffusion might be trained on CSAM because the original list of internet images they started with turned out to link to some. (LAION doesn't actually contain images, just links to them.)
This one isn't true, because they removed NSFW content before training.
2. Some other people are mad that they removed NSFW content because they think it's censorship.
That actually isn't the legal issue I meant though. It's not that they trained on it, it's that it contains adult material at all (and can be shown to children easily), and that it can be used to generate simulated CSAM, which some but not all countries are just as unhappy about.
Several huge commercial and academic projects scraped billions of images off of the Internet and filtered them best they knew how. SD trained on some set of those and later some researchers managed to identify a small number of images classified as CP were still in there.
So, out of the billions of images, was there greater than zero CP images? Yes. Was it intentional/negligent? No. Does it affect the output in any significant way? No. Does it make for internet rage bait and pitchforking? Definitely.
1. Open source even more capable 'adult models' and get sued to oblivion (They still have massive lawsuits)
2. Neuter the model to uselessness and have users abandon it.
Both are bad choices, and require a very, very skilled CEO to thread the needle. Emad failed. that's all.