Apple Turned on 'Discoverable by Others'. You Might Want It Off
wsj.com
wsj.com
I guess it could be useful to keep enabled for your friends. That is, if they're too lazy to enter "I met with Joe and Mary today" in their journal app.
It's like someone comes into your house and changes the furniture.
It's almost suspiciously malicious that they auto-enabled this feature and auto-installed the app for everyone at the same time.
This archive network is also run by an unknown actor with unknown motives but a demonstrated willingness to pay the high infrastructure costs. And this actor refuses to resolve DNS requests unless they include the subnet of the originating IP.
I'm not against posting them, but I wish there were a better option.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDNS_Client_Subnet#Controversy...
If you don’t want your device to be included in that tally of nearby contacts for others, you can toggle it off. Just remember that leaving it on won’t tell your friends—or Apple—anything about you personally.
That sentence seems like a self-contradiction?
If it didn't tell my friends--or Apple--anything about me, how can it result in my friends getting journaling suggestions that are different based on whether the feature is enabled or not?
Unless the author thinks "knowing who you were with and when" does not count as "knowing anything about you," which I would strongly disagree with, and I'm not even generally a paranoid person like some on HN are (no offense to them, glad they're paying attention)
The caveat is that devices store counts not identities, but it does seem like some notion of identity is broadcasted.
Apple’s usually pretty on top of this kind of thing. For example, there was the privacy-preserving Covid proximity thing, and I believe the Find My network works without allowing others to track you?
Is there some fancy cryptographic algorithm that allows a person to broadcast something that allows others that already know them to recognize that a person they know is broadcasting (perhaps not even a specific person, just one they know) - without allowing people they don’t know to recognize they are the same person if they see them again?
* it's a journalling app the user did not seek out and choose to install,
* was not brought to their attention that it was installed,
* with a data-broadcasting setting pre-configured to disregard the users explicitly indicated intentions via the OS lockdown mode setting.
The fact that it's a journalling app seems not to matter at all as far as I can see. The remarkable issue was never that a journalling app wants to record your life.
At any rate, this should never happen. This is not good at all.