Hacker News Reader

Comment by tristan957 | Hacker News Reader

I am a consumer that was harmed just this week because I wasn't added to a group chat of only iPhone users because I have an Android device.

View on HN

Doesn't really seem like a platform issue per se since your friends could have easily included you just fine, but chose not to.

No they couldn't. As soon as they add me, they can no longer remove or add people to a group chat.

Sounds like you need new colleagues. Why would you wish to be part of such a snobbish group? I fail to see why anti-trust law should be brought to bear on issues concerning teen fads. How about wearing the right kind of sneakers? Branded purses, handbags? Parkas? Should uniformity reign universal across all consumer products lest someone, somewhere be excluded to a faddish distinction?

It's not snobby. It's a recognition of the ridiculous walls that Apple puts up around their garden.

This is not one group. This is every single group of American iPhone users. Try to get off iMessenger if you want to see it for yourself.

No it isn't. Nearly all of my group chats are mixed iPhone/Android skewing towards iPhone. We use Facebook Messenger

Blame your friends, I am in plenty of mixed group chats to no issue.

As a European living in the US, I've found that it's nearly impossible to get on American's group chats without an iPhone. Hence I've had to shift my friend groups to be mostly other foreigners.

The Americans all say that to get in, you need an iPhone. So definitely a smart monopolistic strategy from Apple.

It sounds like "I am a car enthusiast who was harmed this week because I wasn't invited to join a Ferrari owners' club since I drive a Lamborghini."

People excluding people is the problem. Not the product.

As soon as my friends add me, they can no longer remove or add people to a group chat? How is that not consumer harm?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com