Electronic project kits: hands on with a vintage 160-in-1 (2016)
medium.com
medium.com
The highlight was when I was futzing with a slow oscillator and accidentally discovered that using using the speaker transformer as a voltage step up I could get the inductive voltage spike when the relay switched to give a painful shock.
I wrote down that wiring diagram so I wouldn't lose it. One of my brothers had built a 9V variable power supply in a high school shop class, so we made use of that to create a pain game: hold the two leads and turn up the 9V supply output until you gave up. Whoever got the voltage knob the highest won. Our arm muscles would be involuntarily twitching, like a TENS unit.
The other game was one person would hide it in the house somewhere, say a closet, and the other person would use an AM radio to locate it, as the spike would release broadband RF energy which could be picked up by the radio. The closer one was the louder the clicking would come out of the speaker.
I still do hobbyist electronics to this day.
Sweet. I had no such access to remote computing power except over ZMODEM for some minutes of friends' BBS sysops machines running DesqView. 90% of my minimum wage money went to computer books at Computer Literacy Bookshop of San Jose because there was no Google'ing for datasheets, specifications, or APIs back then as some of us old codgers remember. ;]
Heh, once I had the money, I bought a very nice bench DMM too, for this exact reason. Not because I really needed it, but because I had an emotional need to counter decades of cheap multimeters.
> I had no such access to remote computing power
I had no remote access from my home. To use the computer, I had to take a 45 minute ride on the city bus.
It's funny how I get more nostalgic of the rougher times than the easier times.
I remember that! In some versions of the manual, this was specifically listed as an experiment, but I think they later removed it.
I just checked, if you go to page 51 (project #43, "High Voltage Generator") of the 160-in-1 manual and you'll find that exact experiment.
Thinking back, we were really bored
The modern equivalent of course are Snap Circuits https://elenco.com/snapcircuits/ but having purchased one of the larger kits for my kids a couple years back I think they suffer from the same basic problem. Sure telling 10 year old me about BJT biasing might have been a bit much, but I really think it should have been included in some kind of side note even if it doesn't sink in the first time.
PS: Actually thinking back on it, these spring board ones are probably better from the perspective that a blown component was easy to replace simply by pulling out the cardboard flipping it over and disconnecting the component from the springs underside.
I did, however, sneak another resistor under the potentiometer because the kids' radio build was too loud.
Later I was given a Radionic 160 (or 140?) which had a sturdy hardboard base and boasted Real Silicon Chips (a couple of 741 op amps). It also had an analogue meter. I made a lot of things with that kit. Then I discovered that my town had a shop [1] that sold basic components and surplus boards, and the classic Tandy (Radio Shack) electronics books. So I got a breadboard and got good at de-soldering, and the parts from the kit slowly got picked-off and scavenged for other projects... like a sky burial.
Then I discovered computers in the early 80s, went on to do a software engineering degree and a career as a dev, and didn't do any electronics for 25 years. It was fun coming back to it later, but its hard to just "play" when there's so much choice and complexity.
Like seemingly many here, this is part of my origin story as a techie. I guess I was lucky to have parents who cared and wanted to stimulate my interests, and to have grown up in a time before pervasive distraction. Different times now.
But also, I confess: I don't feel like I really learned that much from it. I already had a rudimentary Ohms law & binary logic understandings in elementary school, and most of the projects either were obvious from that premise, or were way way above my head & quasi-magical. I loved these things, they were inspirational, but I struggle to recall learning much from them.
You could make things like a radio receiver, a monophonic keyboard, a baby monitor. With my radio receiver I first discovered Radio Luxembourg, which my father disapproved of; I listened to it under the bedcover. I also discovered Captain Beefheart and Jethro Tull on the John Peel show.
I built things from the book, and tinkered, but didn't really learn anything from that.
I got into it properly circa 2012. I probably learned more in one week than I ever did from tinkering with that. Electronics requires proper study. For any circuit of moderate complexity, your intuition for what is happening will be poor without the background. The hands-on experience and familiarity that brings about is great, and it was a lot of fun, I always had this lingering dissatisfaction that I don't know what's going on.
I had a computer in parallel with this, and that soaked up my tech-oriented attention.
One problem I remember is that the coil-spring connection method in the kit had reliability issues. The contact produced by a wire clipped into a tiny spring isn't always very good, and if you have a few dozen of them which all have to be good for the circuit to work, the odds work against you. Today I understand why; most likely the layers of oxidation on the wire and coil are the culprit. When you clip the stripped wire end into the coil, there isn't a sliding motion there, or not always, that will break through the oxidation. I suspect the springs are just ordinary spring steel springs, not coated with anything for promoting good contact, like nickel.
If I had one of these kits today, I would give it some TLC to make it more reliable.
More recently, found a 160-ish-in-1 set, the kind with one quad NAND gate, one dual op amp. Challenged myself to do something really hard with it, namely, display incrementing digits on the 7-segment display as the potentiometer is turned. I got as far as 1-2-3-4. It may just barely be possible, maybe, to get to 1-2-3-4-5. I never tried that but I did manage a circuit that displays binary counts from 000 to 111, yes, 7 increments, using three of the LEDs in the 7-segment display. This was intended as a challenge for others, one a teenager, the other an adult, who had shown transient interest in learning electronics, but neither took up the challenge.
I do have a writeup for the 1-2-3-4 circuit if anyone wants it privately (m a r k u s @ w a n d e l . c a), and I think I did make a wiring list for the 000-111 circuit. Both the sets have gone of course, given to the intended challengees.
https://radioshackcatalogs.com/science_fair_kits.htm
I had the 130-in-1. Yesterday, I was thinking about it for probably the first time in 20+ years - what a coincidence that this link popped up today. I was a bit too young to actually learn much from it beyond the basics, but I remember having a lot of fun with #85, the "Falling Bomb Sound".
I especially loved the flipflop circuit. And the meow thing for the piezo speaker. Really cool.
Edit: I think it was this one, the 30 in one: https://www.picclickimg.com/auIAAOSwNPhhbIBS/Vintage-Science...
I never liked the spring thingies to affix the wires though. It was messy.
[0] https://archive.org/details/funway_into_electronics/funway_i...
Electronics Australia anyone: https://archive.org/details/EA1998/EA%201998-01%20January/ ??
I can't assess how much I learned from it. But it really cemented a love for tinkering and made me fearless about it.
It has that “wow” factor, but as I kid I think I moved on to breadboards pretty quickly. That, and we had a bunch of Engineer’s Mini-Notebook by Forrest Mims III. These kits are very cool but I remember that it felt a little more like paint-by-numbers.
These kits, plus the Radio Shack Forrest Mims books, will always have a special place in my heart.
Might find one on eBay…
At the time I was not able to make the leap in understanding to go beyond just following the recipes in the manual to doing anything creative with it, which ultimately was a little disappointing.
But looking back I guess I did learn basically how to read a schematic and the different types of components. And it was neat just getting everything wired up correctly and working.
They were fantastic fun too.
I have a lot of fond memories of, like, going to OMSI and doing the experiments in the chemlab.
And of course ebay and archive.org/etc is a source for the old manuals or even kits (I recently saw the SFX-4000 aeronautical lab kit in an old fashioned toy store in town BTW) if you can't be bothered to grab the manual and do a bit of footwork to restore an old kit. But frankly people have to fond of memories for those kits. For example, a good used microscope from a college can be picked up on ebay and some slide + stains for just a few dollars these days and its a far more useful tool that the cheap toy oriented kits. And while I printed and bound a copy of the golden book of chemistry some years ago, one should really read more recent criticisms of that book before handing it to your child (ex; don't go tasting lead based compounds).
The scale and design of the Radio Shack kits has worked for me and I have actually tinkered after decades of being off put by breadboards.
The Radio Shack kits are not professional tools which is a feature not a bug. If you have always wanted to play with electronics, it might be worth picking one up on eBay.
Or not.
These would be really useful in my day to day engineering life, I should find mine!
- all core concepts explained on one board
- no dangerous electricity when learning
- no soldering required
- parts of the kit can later be re-used in a real EV conversion
I built some custom EVs myself and drove 20k miles with them and am sharing my knowledge :)
Sketches on the kit include:
- BMS sample exercises
- Three-phase A/C motor control (all modern cars have A/C motors)
- Precharge inverter circuit
- ...
I got a KiCAD board mockup and am putting a landing page together for pre-orders.
If anyone is interested in talking about this, please(!) drop me a line on:
hello@foxev.io
as I am looking for early adopters who would be interested in something like this and give feedback.
I spent a lot of time as a kid just making sparks. I loved taking batteries, wire, and a steel file and running the wire up and down the file while it sparked.
Totally brainless, yet somehow I still managed to become a EE and an extra-class HAM.
I built a lot of the Radioshack project-in-a-box kits though.
Then my uncle brought back one of these 160-in-1 kits from the US. No such problem there! This thing could broadcast to the whole neighbourhood. I must have annoyed everyone and broken so many laws in the process.
I like this blog post but I disagree with this conclusion. I think it is regularly the excitement of the idea of crafting something that leads us to buy things we have no projects for.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gakken_EX-System
It was a lot more robust than the spring-based electronics experimenter systems, and its built-in shield meant that my experimental circuits could survive the transport to school and the inevitable attempted rip of cables from the bullies, in order to show my favourite Math teacher what I had been up to over the weekend, and that led him to give me a student key to the schools computer room, and free access so I could hone my skills.
I still collect Denshi Block systems, and the day I got the EX-181 with its synthesizer module was particular joyous. In Japan, Denshi Block systems were used in electronics engineering schools, and they were much, much larger and with a bigger variety of component modules .. I'd love to have one of those one day.
https://cdn.makezine.com/uploads/2011/04/gakken_ex-150_engli...