Why do they always headline the % change but not the actual %?
2x negligible could still be negligible...
2x negligible could still be negligible...
By far the bigger problem IMHO is not controlling by weight (at least, the article seems to hint that doing so might happpen in further research...), which is highly correlated both to cardiovascular disease and the chance of being on a restrictive diet plan. "Fat people more likely to have a heart attack, and also to be on a diet" doesn't have the same clickbaity ring to it.
Without knowing what these numbers mean really hard to draw any conclusion. Also, somewhat irresponsible for eurekalert to publish something like this on an unreleased study.