Apex Legends finals postponed after suffering unprecedented hack
polygon.com
polygon.com
>"It really is incredible that they would run these finals on the live internet."
I think they were thinking in terms of doing in-person physical LAN versions, and as another reply said that's a not insignificant undertaking in terms of cost (if nothing else, just plain having potential competitors from all over make their way there), though given all the amateur traditional sports that manage it for everything from surfing to dogsledding I'm a little skeptical that it'd be that impossible for these companies. But yeah it's a jump.
However, I do wonder if there's ever been any consideration to using VPNs to that end, at least for the finals? Have players set up a WG tunnel to the mothership with all other networking disabled just for the match, that'd be about as good and if it was super easy seems like players could be onboard for it as well. It wouldn't be some big interfering kernel thing like so much anti-cheat, not anti-cheat at all in fact just security against external griefing, they could turn it right off after. Given this is clearly unusual maybe not something to worry about in general, but could be an approach if it proves a bigger problem.
There's the potential that for, say, consoles this might not be sufficient at this point in time sadly.
https://twitter.com/ZPostFacto/status/1395765704155033603
It's probably on a case-by-case basis, but Apex is actually running on a fork of Valve's Source Engine, so they have a pre-existing relationship outside of Steam.
[1] https://www.oneesports.gg/league-of-legends/lck-spring-2024-...
What's interesting is that the two confirmed targets (Hal and Gen—not sure if any others were impacted) are two top dogs on the scene right now. IIRC their respective teams have a somewhat friendly rivalry going on. In other words, these are guys with lots of wins under their belt who don't need aimbots to take home cash prizes.
So I'm rabidly curious to know how the person behind the hack pulled this off, but also really want to how they chose the specific players to target or what their motivations were in the first place. Maybe they have some kind of grudge and they want to "expose" (read as: frame) these guys or just get their hands dirty.
Seems there are mentions of Easy Anti-Cheat having a vulnerability, but I'm not sure how trustworthy that is. It's a widely used anti-cheat, if it has a vulnerability, it would be big news, bigger than the "Apex Legends final being postponed" story.
But who would blow such a 0day on ruining a competition, instead of doing something profitable and sneaky? Gotta admire that, seems it was just for "fun".
https://twitter.com/TeddyEAC/status/1769725032047972566
Unless something similar happens in another game with EAC I would assume it's exploit(s) in the game itself - the remote attack surface of the game is orders of magnitude larger than the anti-cheat after all.
> Yeah, or a RCE that allowed them to directly hit each individual client, rather than coming from the server?
Maybe, but Apex has dedicated servers so there isn't a great deal of client-to-client communication to potentially exploit.
The article points out:
> In the Genburten clip, the streamer’s chat can be seen to read “Apex hacking global series by Destroyer2009 & R4ndom.”
So maybe some other folks had their own CTF competition concurrently. Pretty cyberpunk. Who knows what the prize was.
After all, given Destroyers track record posted here by someone else, they clearly have a close association with the cheat creaters. Since they have been using them for so long.
All they did was enable it on their live streams.
Thanks for reading
At least this remote-code-execution was essentially "harmless" as these things go. Who knows if the next one will be, or even if this has happened with malicious intent before - without attracting so much attention.
It's honestly a miracle that these sorts of exploits in games haven't been used maliciously on any large scale.
It's also important to note that the 2 players targeted in yesterday's games are both multiple LAN champions from rival teams so the likelihood that they themselves were cheating is quite low. Per another streamer targeted via the Apex packs, Mande, claims to have had a conversation with the cheater and was able to glean that the cheater was motivated via "fun" or attention. It'd likely stand to reason that the 2 players were victims of a phishing attack rather than an RCE in Apex/EAC. If it's an RCE, why waste such a big bad powerful vulnerability on just 2 players and not target as many as you can if the motive really is "for the lulz"? There'd sure be a lot more lulz to be had if the hacker targeted as many people as he could. Using Occam's Razer without context, it's again likely phishing. Destroyer2009 does seem to have some sort of server-side access given the gifted Apex packs and ability to spawn in and control bots in-game. It'll be interesting to see what Respawn/EA have to say about this incident though we'll likely never get the full technical picture.
As an aside, if the first player targeted, Genburten, never had the in-game chat show up and the second attack on ImperialHal never happened, Genburten's gaming career would've been in the gutter. How would he prove an isolated one-off attack on his PC that remotely installed cheats and turned them on?
Interesting discussion from Thor at PirateSoftware[2]
[1]: https://youtu.be/7e3mia4b-_Q?t=192 [2]: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2094227670?t=8h41m6s
I also think that he specifically did it in a way that would minimize the risk of those players being accused of cheating cause he respects them and doesn't want to ruin their careers.
Now that's what I call elite.
- stream sniped ImperialHal and Gen
- had some way of getting uuids from the client
- used those uuids in combination with an RCE
However, I'm still leaning more strongly towards the theory that gamers who don't care about security got social engineered into downloading a RAT and have compromised computers.
And if it happened to two, it's infinitely more likely that could be leveraged to social engineer others in that group.