The claim was made years ago, the issue was the set of math that you need to understand to be able to judge the claimed proof was brand new theoretical ground and it was over one thousand pages of dense mathematical reasoning. I hope this write up is much easier to understand and now a few other mathematicians can read this and perhaps understand the thousand pages more easily.
This is a new claim by a new author building on the previous work.
Okay thanks, I thought it was simply a simmering of the original works, but I don’t have the brains for this stuff anymore so I guess I missed that it was a new line of reasoning.