I'd be pleasantly surprised if he (and oDesk, by extension) were to share this data. They're very profitable, and this type of information might offer them a competitive edge. Moreover, it appears as if they're also fervid believers in intellectual property law's "right to exclusion" applied to ridiculous vague quasi-inventions, viz. http://www.google.com/patents/US20060284838. Luckily, this is only an application, and its longer-than-typical prosecution history will hopefully prevent them from trolling too much, thanks to prosecution history estoppel.