If you're not paying your dues, why do you think the state should have an obligation to protect you and your property?
If you're not paying your dues, why do you think the state should have an obligation to protect you and your property?
Warren v. District of Columbia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
Castle Rock v. Gonzales http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales
Davidson v. City of Westminster , 32 Cal.3d 197 http://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/davidson-v-city-westminst...
Hartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) , 46 Cal.App.3d 6 http://www.lawlink.com/research/caselevel3/51629
Linda Riss v. City of New York http://www2.newpaltz.edu/%7Ezuckerpr/cases/riss.htm
DeShaney v. Winnebago County http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeShaney_v._Winnebago_County
Susman v. City of Los Angeles269 Cal. App. 2d 803 http://law.justia.com/cases/california/calapp2d/269/803.html
South v. Maryland, 59 U.S. (How.) 396, 15 L.Ed.433 (1856) http://www.endtimesreport.com/NO_AFFIRMATIVE_DUTY.htm
…and many more! https://archive.is/MbIeH
2. That's what states are for.