There will be tons of fear and outrage for them to monetize.
There will be tons of fear and outrage for them to monetize.
Seems like anytime I hear people use 'They', 'Them' as some broad category of some secret organization driving things. It is increasingly hard to decipher what the 'they/them' is referring to? Is it Q-anon? Deep Christian State?
'They' are doing this to 'Us'. But can never really pin it down? Every conspiracy is always shifting to a new 'They'.
From other post.
Thought on re-reading OP comment, 'them' could just refer to generic 'media', and not be right/left.
It shows how even language is getting warped. Frequently right leaning news uses 'They' for every type of boogie man. So if a comment has 'They' it sounds right leaning.
If you can't tell, you're not part of the conversation.
If you're (much more likely) trying to frame the poster as some kind of conspiracy theorist . . . there's a different STFU for that one.
It is only factual in that news/media desire conflict in order to gain attention and sales. Conflict is part of the business model.
But, both ways.
Fox wants to foment conflict as much as CNN.
But the comment is staged as one directional, 'If Trump Wins', then 'They', will be up in arms to write stories about it. As if the reporting on the right is 'holier', more 'altruistic'. This is completely false.
Edit:
Thought on re-reading OP comment, 'them' could just refer to generic 'media', and not be right/left.
It shows how even language is getting warped. Frequently right leaning news uses 'They' for every type of boogie man. So if a comment has 'They' it sounds right leaning.
It’s just a mathematical fact. Many news organizations report revenue and viewership figures that bear this out.