This is a great point. People will complain if LMs are applying to anything, but ultimately it improves accessibility, and allows for someone to dive deeper when needed.

There will always be ways to misinterpret some academic work, and there are plenty of opportunities in the path of understanding a work to do that.

Allowing someone to engage with a work _at all_ by lifting some barriers (visually impaired people's for exampld) should be acknowledged as an improvement, not discouraged continually for having some bugs.