Boeing Whistleblower: "If Anything Happens to Me, It's Not Suicide"
twitter.com
twitter.com
edit: just found this one on page 6 now.
edit2: both are completely gone now off any page.
edit3: now it's claimed as a [dupe] and the active discussion is dead.
Wow.
Many older Boeing articles with less points and less comments are on the first 10 pages.
It dropped to page 8 within seconds, I haven't seen that before.
--
edit: on a meta note, why did this submission flash on the homepage, and now I can't find it?
edit2: I can't find the dupe submission either: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39712618
edit3: I found this submission now on page 6, it was just on the first page and gaining comments and votes fast until just now.
edit4: both submissions are completely gone now off any page.
@dang?
I think we fall into a false sense of "How could this happen and no one get caught doing it". I know I've had that thought for decades now but murders keep happening and people keep getting away with it. I find myself thinking "Wow, I guess that was easier than I thought it'd be (thinking back 1-4 years), but _now_ it would be harder", the issue is I've had that same thought almost every year so clearly my guess of how hard it would be is way off.
edit: missed the /s, stupid brain
Side note, for my sanity, did this article disappear off the first page for you as well?
It's on page 6 for me now.
edit: it's completely gone now off any page.
The other submission also wasn't flagged, even as of now, but it's gone on the pages.
There's much older and deader Boeing articles that are still on pages 3-10.
The interesting case with Boeing is, its not only that the company would want this person gone, but rather the entire US government too. Boeing is "too big to fail."
Front page isn't what we vote for, it's manually curated by dang and other moderators.
For actual popular stuff go to /active.
But yes, authorities should investigate and should go where the investigation takes them.
Boeing and friends are too big to actually look into, similar to the island being an event that was too big to actually look into.
That said, I think suicide is the most likely cause, but we should avoid failures of imagination and consider the possibility.[0]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motive_(law)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naivety
You can't just take things as face value when people can lie, deceive, plot, and other more horrific things.
Especially when there's motive and a wall of coincidences.
For example, the U.S. and German governments have taken the position that the Russian federation conspired to have a Chechen leader killed in Berlin, Germany[1]. He was ultimately caught, and surveillance footage seems to have played a role, but if you look into the details of the case, it seems likely he was an experienced contract killer who could have gotten away with many other lower-profile killings.
I’d think it’s one of Boeings stockholders who had a judge against him speaking out.
You think crazy Jennifer made this up for her 5 minutes of fame?
I'm in the camp that they did, in fact, hire someone or someone within their organization did to protect their interests in this case. Whether it's from corporate or from just the group of folks that might/would/will be indicted from the whistleblowers testimony. You don't land on 21-black 3 times in a row and say it's luck.
He was suing Boeing for defamation And his claims were that Boeing retaliated against him for being a whistleblower. It might seem like the same thing, but it’s not.
And the instances promoting criminal investigation are related to the 737 probes, not the 787 that he was a whistleblower about. There no evidence his civil case was the impetus for those criminal probes.
Also to say that Foo in Green is in no way connected to Foo in Blue is a farce. 737,777,787, they all share a safety process and protocol. To say he was talking about oranges when the probes are about apples when it’s all about the Grocery Store is absurd. It’s connected. May not be directly connected, but it’s connected. It’s bad management, bad practice, sus circumstances, a coverup on the left and a dead body on the right.
I mean why would someone who has given up everything to blow the whistle and devoted the past 7 years trying to get something done about it all a sudden kill himself in the middle of a trail and before a potential DOJ criminal investigation?
The man had a mission, why would he do Boeing a favor and kill himself so that he could not testify at a criminal hearing?
Imagine this in a criminal trail he would testify against his direct managers who would then just say “hey, I was told by my boss to tell him to do x” and then it bubbles up the chain to the executives.
Not only are the reasons fairly obvious, but the history of that being exactly what happens is pretty compelling evidence that, independently of arguments over its rationality, that is very much a thing people in that situation do.
1) The legislature - Law makers have been captured through campaign contributions. In MOST cases a law maker has no say in how they vote, they are told by their campaign managers.
2) The judicial - Similarly judges tend to run for their seat every 4 years. In family court any divorce attorney worth their salt is donating the maximum amount to every judge every time they run. Then when they are in front of the judge in court just a thumbs up and a nod is enough to remind the judge who REALLY got them elected.
3) Corporations are DONE paying taxes and have been for a long time. Successful corporations have figured out how to siphon money from not only their customers but their employees and the federal government as well.
4) The money supply and system in general is fucked beyond repair and anyone willing or able to point that out is going to be on the "kill list".
Whistleblowing rapidly loses attractively if you know that you will get putined.
Why pay someone off? Why be scared? Just kill anyone you don't like. They do it because they can. They are companies with country-sized budgets.
This is corporation sponsored terrorism against the population.
Will there be consequences? I doubt it.
Those are serious allegations.
I would rather wait for an inquiry/coroner/etc to shed more light on what's happened.
It’s usually something like “if stock drops 2.5% at this number, we’re forced to buy the inverse option to hedge our bets and we loose X amount” (over simplification)
Just look at the GME stuff and how much money was lost due to retail trading meme behavior
Management gets a contact who is a fixer, hired though an attorney, hiring a contractor who does investigations who happen to have contacts who will do field work research.
Field researcher gets name, hotel, car, follows from deposition and when the schedule becomes predictable an interaction or two occurs. Maybe an offer to stay silent followed up with a threat or action that will further persuade a favorable outcome for the hiring agency.
Upper management has zero exposure and everyone down the line was vague enough to be removed from direct action with the trigger being unaffiliated party.
Want to punish a neighbor? Pay a homeless guy to hire a homeless guy to throw a rock through a window. Who gets arrested? Not the home owner. Homeless guys can't be trusted for their witness. No records. Window is still broken.
https://www.newsweek.com/john-barnett-boeing-whistleblower-p...
https://abcnews4.com/news/local/if-anything-happens-its-not-...
There however is less reason to believe this was suicide given the circumstances.
Assassinations, by definition, are done to keep the actual person behind them hidden.
What we do have is a series of problematic behavior Boeing is doing, that fit an MO.
Also, it's clear that *you do* have an opinion on this.