I haven't followed this case but I found the blog posts doing the initial investigation quite interesting. Not only due to all the errors in the data but also because it gives some insight into how Excel works behind the scenes:
I'm confused by her suing and her argument in court though. Is her argument that they didn't catch her in front of the computer so someone else might have fauxed the data or is her argument that no data was altered? Because it seems undeniable that the data was altered to align with the hypothesis.