Hacker News Reader

> The woman says "no" in the video itself according to her lawyer.

Is that evidence of something? It's common as dirt in professionally-produced porn. What's to catch?

The difference is that she is alleging in court that she was not acting.

That can't be the difference. It's literally impossible - the comment above me is blaming OnlyFans for not catching it.

Not noticing something that isn't yet true is not blameworthy by any standard.

If it requires adjudication from a judge, a process that takes many months or even years, complaining about a false-positive moderation on some website is really neither here nor there.

That's just as much an assumption going the other day. It's not unusual for the news to report on allegations made in lawsuits.

Professionally-produced porn has 2257 consent verification documents for every actor. My guess is that OF and the uploaders do not have those documents from this woman.

Why do you assume that? As you've said down thread, her alleged rapists also allegedly stole her identity and defrauded onlyfans.

Try opening an OF account and see how far you get. Since we are speculating I am guessing something doesn't add up in the article as reported. ;)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com