For this to be ambiguous requires an obscene amount of Americentrism.

It could bring up the Cambodian genocide where Pol Pot executed millions of people. Trump hasn't done anything comparable, so it is hard to argue he was worse.

Edit: Here is what Claude says, I think you should at least be able to say this even if you dislike Trump:

> So while both figures were authoritarian rulers who caused significant damage, Pol Pot's crimes against humanity and genocide resulted in exponentially more death and suffering on a mass scale compared to Trump's tenure as president. Most historians and human rights groups would regard Pol Pot as one of the most evil political leaders in modern history.

"Pol Pot killed millions of people, but Donald Trump wrote insensitive tweets, so it's difficult to say who caused more harm"

Is this the cambonian version of holocaust denial?

It should say "Pol Pot caused more harm."

What do you think it should say?

>What do you expect it to say?

And people wonder why we are in the state we are in. American politics have completely destroyed some people's minds.