Thank you! They should have clarified this up front in the title or the abstract. The original article makes it sound like it has been resolved:
> (title) Webb & Hubble confirm Universe’s expansion rate
> (abstract) ... However, a persistent difference, called the Hubble Tension, is seen between the value of the constant measured with a wide range of independent distance indicators and its value predicted from the afterglow of the Big Bang. The NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope has confirmed that the Hubble Space Telescope’s keen eye was _right all along_ (emphasis mine), erasing any lingering doubt about Hubble’s measurements.
This feels like bad reporting to me. A better title would be "Webb confirms Hubble's measurement of Universe’s expansion rate", but that would probably be less exciting...