The invention of blue and purple pigments in ancient times (2006)
pubs.rsc.org
pubs.rsc.org
Just seems like University admins (and everyone in between) got involved to hinder a deal between inventor and commercializing partner.
That's more like Williamsburg or Old Holland prices.
Maybe Sigma has it
https://shop.kremerpigments.com/us/shop/pigments/45320-yinmn...
- "I myself have seen the fleece upon the living animal dyed purple, scarlet, and violet,—a pound and a half of dye being used for each,—just as though they had been produced by Nature in this form, to meet the demands of luxury."
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/60230/pg60230-images.ht... (Book VIII, Chapter 74)
דבר אל־בני ישראל ואמרת אלהם ועשו להם ציצת על־כנפי בגדיהם לדרתם ונתנו על־ציצת הכנף פתיל תכלת
(from "Numbers 15" in common termonology).
Because we don't know the dye that was used 3000 years ago, today most omit the blue thread, but some people claim that they know what it was (see https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/530127/jewish...) and wear fringes with blue.
(It's from a cuttlefish, the "chilazon")
Personally, I wear the blue thread, but I don't think we really know for sure what they used back then.
Were I party to that contract, I (being aware of non-english distinctions) would wear any azure/голубой (sky, not ocean, blue), for:
a) a colour is specified, neither dye nor pigment. (pedantically, it need not even be a reflective colour, presumably something emissive, eg blue EL wire, would be equally acceptable)
b) 15:39 says the colour is meant for the eyes of the wearer, to remind them, so in this case the proper interpretation of "blue" is not even whatever that colour may have been 3'000 years ago, but whatever suggests "tekhelet" to the garment's wearer, today.
(in particular, a tritanope ought to be able to wear suitable grey threads)
Caveat: I have no hebrew, and english has lost its second person singular. Is the second person in the original singular or plural? In the latter case, (b) would need to be amended to match a community, not a personal, interpretation, and the tritanope should then be less free and more frum.
Edit: I think I see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/אתם#Hebrew in there, so it needs to be a community blue. Sucks to be a tritanope, but presumably english monoglots (who don't make the sky/ocean distinction in their basic colours; compare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_term#Color-term_hierarch... ) would be fine with any blue.
(Murex snails being a different hypothesis for the source of the forgotten tekheret dye, separate from the cuttlefish one).
[0] https://static01.nyt.com/images/2024/03/05/multimedia/05SCI-...
photo from https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/05/science/archaeology-tyria... ("In Israel, a 3,000-Year-Old Purple Factory")
"The sepiolite stems from commercially available cat litter."
Also reminds me of:
And, well, I miss this guy even if I never met him.