Distributions are often more interesting than averages or medians alone.
Reporting a loss of theoretical IQ points is weird terminology since IQ people want you to believe it's measuring something that exists called "g", but then they don't report this result as a loss of "g". Of course they also happily claim every other test that produces a number like the SAT is also a true measurement of your intelligence and you're doomed to never be able to increase it. Basically they just believe any statement as long as it's got numbers in it and it says something they like.
Cognitive impairment is a terrifying idea but I think it’s important to balance the risk of COVID-associated cognitive impairment with the risk of cognitive decline that would result from whatever social isolation would be necessary to avoid COVID.
Is cognitive decline due to COVID really comparable to that of lead exposure? If so, I’d really appreciate more concrete information to put the risk into context.