I always assumed that was what killed Xeon Phi. Hard to justify a GEMM card in and of itself. However clever you get, NVIDIA will be back next year with twice as much bandwidth.
Melting connectors, obscene pricing, marginal performance increase, zero availability; then when hardly any of that was addressed, Ti versions release which are equally expensive, and equally lacklustre. Combine that with patchy support for frame generation and 30xx series cards still going really strong, and you’ve got not a lot of incentive to upgrade.
In units sold?
I’m sure they don’t mind having both revenue streams of course! But on the other hand, they have to serve two sets of interests.
If you haven't yet, buy some bitcoin and stop letting the government steal your hard earned money through inflation.
1. The hardware isn't nVidia's primary moat. CUDA is. Currently all machine learning tooling assumes you have a CUDA device.
2. The hype cycle may be real, but nobody really knows how much better AI will become. The uncertainty is driving the hype (which is obviously on the optimistic side), but it could well be that models become so good that everyone "needs" an AI chip like how we "need" a smartphone today.
3. The gaming/graphics market is probably going to slowly shrink. There's only so many pixels you can push to the eye. There's very real diminishing returns there. At some point people literally won't be able to tell the difference between the newer/better/faster graphics and the older generation, at which point the GPU vendor's margins drop significantly.
People really don't appreciate this. So many times I see people comment that AMD should implement CUDA and not try to get software to move standard.
AMD have a massive task ahead because they NEED to get CUDA unseated just to play on a level playing ground, let alone win.