Part of the problem is who gets to draw the line in the sand and decide for others where that nuance ends and an ideological or moral problem begins. Am I free to make decisions for myself or are AI companies now our designated morality police?
If you lack either the resources, or the skills, you are absolutely entitled to complain about the lack of availability, but there should be no expectation that some other individual or business should bear the public relations, social, or real financial cost of building a tool to satisfy whatever interests you might have in using an uncensored AI.
The fact that one of the few businesses willing to do it is Gab says a great deal about the primary reasons folks want these.
What exactly are you complaining about?
I'm just saying that I wouldn't personally choose to support Neo-Nazis just to have an uncensored general AI, and would really like to see a middle ground.
Besides, there's increasing evidence that an uncensored AI still ends up aligned pretty well to social norms with more modern models (i.e. Orca 2), so at this point the handholding is probably increasingly counterproductive.