The authors argument that SQL's english-like syntax is a "well-intentioned error" overlooks the accessibility it provides. SQL, inspired by relational algebra, enables set-based operations, distinct from procedural programming's linear approach.

This is why SQL has endured for so long.

That mathematical base allows for efficient data manipulation across vast datasets.

To his point that no other languages strive to be spoken like, languages like ruby (and python to a degree )have successfully adopted a natural, english-like syntax, enhancing readability and developer productivity.

Emphasizing procedural over declarative concepts misinterprets SQL's core advantage: expressing complex data relationships and manipulations succinctly. Such perspectives miss the broader utility of making programming languages approachable and efficient for diverse tasks and user backgrounds.

Side rant: I just wish SQL was more composable.