"There is general agreement on several typological similarities being widely found among the languages considered under Ural–Altaic:
head-final and subject–object–verb word order
in most of the languages, vowel harmony
morphology that is predominantly agglutinative and suffixing zero copula
non-finite clauses
lack of grammatical gender
lack of consonant clusters in word-initial position
having a separate verb for existential clause which is different from ordinary possession verbs like "to have""
It's actually even more complicated than that: yabanjin is a kan'on/Tang dynasty era borrowing, so it came from the Middle Chinese spoken in Chang'an/Xi'an around the 8th century, which would have been quite different from the modern Mandarin yemanren.