Do literally anything
aaronfrancis.com
aaronfrancis.com
It's a highly accurate radar system into the fact that I know what I should be doing, and I just want to cover it over and pretend that I don't as a means of continuing on and amplifying my own exciting melodrama!
If used judiciously, they can help. Caution: Do not use free-to-play microtransaction games for this purpose (with a few possible exceptions) as those games tend to monetize pain.
You're better off doing something real, though. Bake a loaf of bread. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to make yourself a sandwich with bread you made.
This cycle of goal -> completion -> next goal is the opposite of depression. Do what you need to lift yourself out. You can do it.
Slide 1: To do list.
Slide 2: <Fill items from the todo list into this 2x2 matrix>
| | Not important | Important now |
| | now | |
|----------------|---------------|---------------|
| Not actionable | | |
| now | | |
|----------------|---------------|---------------|
| Actionable now | | |
|----------------|---------------|---------------|
Slide 3:
We pick the most important of the important now/actionable now
quadrant and break that down into action items.Over time, this has proven to be incredibly powerful at focusing us on the things that matter while not losing track of how everything else are evolving.
Urgent + Important = Do now
Urgent + Not Important = Delegate
Not Urgent + Important = Schedule for later
Not Urgent + Not Important = Drop
Good insight :) I'll leave it at that.
Indeed, it started with the Eisenhower Matrix, but the problem for us was that everything is Urgent in some sense. Things that aren't urgent don't usually make it to the top of our list.
On the other hand, we needed a mechanism to track things that we couldn't actually make forward progress on, despite it being urgent. These are the "Not actionable" items - usually because they're blocked on something else.
The final point I'll make is that the most valuable part in this exercise is actually reaching consensus on what quadrant to put an item in. It's superb at getting alignment.
…and yet it is so true (and so hard to actually put into regular practice) that I’m happy to hear it a thousand times.
I happen to use the latter method to get things done. I don't know what the real solution to this is, because since I'm the one who creates firewalls on all my devices, I also happen to know how to work around them and turn them off. With enough time spent with firewalls on, I have slowly started to forget that I can turn the firewall off. But the internal urge sometimes breaks this discipline and the end result is often hours spent on YouTube or Hacker News (like right now, typing this comment).
Doesn't matter what $stuff is, just do it.
(Please don't sue me, Nike.)
Do literally anything besides that.
> The solution lies in the “power of two choices” load‑balancing algorithm. Instead of making the absolute best choice using incomplete data, with “power of two choices” you pick two queues at random and chose the better option of the two, avoiding the worse choice.
> “Power of two choices” is efficient to implement. You don’t have to compare all queues to choose the best option each time; instead, you only need to compare two. And, perhaps unintuitively, it works better at scale than the best‑choice algorithms. It avoids the undesired herd behavior by the simple approach of avoiding the worst queue and distributing traffic with a degree of randomness.
I suffer from this decision fatigue, burnout, or anxiety all too often. I'm also especially vulnerable as someone with ADHD, since I don't get that dopamine hit when I successfully accomplish a task.
What I've found really useful is a combination of medication and accepting that I should continue to do things my not making the worst decision. For example, if I need to do a DIY task, I'll read a blog, watch a YouTube, and maybe ask two contractors and make the best decision out of whatever I find out. Alternatively, if I need to accomplish a bunch of chores, I'll look at the list and roughly sort them by urgency and importance. I don't need to pick the most urgent-important task, just one that falls into that category.
I think of it as time-boxing for your bookkeeping. I find the meta-work that helps you decide what work you need to do can be endless so if I just set a 5 minute or 25 minute alarm, it helps me get out of that bottomless time sink. I also time-box how much productivity time I want to spend on something. Often, I'll think that a task should be easy and I should be able to do it in 30 minutes. But after 30 minutes pass, I'll have a lot more experience to say this if a task is actually worth whatever new estimate I can provide.
You can spend an endless amount of time researching and making decisions on how you should behave, but the returns diminish as you do more research and soon you should just do things. Doing things will teach you, sometimes much more than just researching and planning.
I'd recommend reading about time-boxing, pomodoro, Eisenhower matrix, deep work, power of two choices, explore vs exploit, and 37% rule if you're interested in "getting things done" and personal performance optimization.
[1]: https://www.nginx.com/blog/nginx-power-of-two-choices-load-b...
My issue is that I have a million creative things to do, so I become so overwhelmed I can only muster the energy for YouTube.