> "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide."
It's hard not to be a bit cynical about such an arrangement.
It's hard not to be a bit cynical about such an arrangement.
Here's a hint: If you ever think "I can't trust anyone else with this", you are probably doing something wrong.
Back when the public at least somewhat bought the idea that SV was socially progressive and would use its massive accumulation of capital for the good of humanity.