No, No I am not, because things I care about are broken, and all of the supposed improvements wayland offers simply don't bother me. I've tried it, yes it feels a little snappier sometimes, but that's not a huge priority for me, personally.
X11 is fine.
So they make Gnome X-less, then debian will incorporate that, then other DEs will get less attention, etc… It will go downhill fast from there on.
I've begun the process of moving all of my machines away from Linux and to BSD anyway. While I have so many that the effort will probably take a couple of years to complete, perhaps I can complete it before I really get bit by this issue.
Or, worst case, I'll just stop updating and keep everything frozen on a version that meets my needs
I'm not seeing the progression there; of course I can easily imagine GNOME dropping X support, and sure Debian isn't going to patch it in (probably), but... so what? Nothing about that affects other DEs/WMs.
There is no faster way to fix software problems then pushing it prod.
I can't do this in linuw: https://twitter.com/xundecidability/status/17632190171608678...
Either way screen recording is working in all major wayland WMs, so you can do that in "linuw" (or whatever you choose to call it)
I don't know what screen recording has to do with anything? Like, yes Wayland also makes the computer vision half of that example harder (you can do it in all major compositors, but details vary and GNOME is outright hostile to automating it) but Wayland doesn't have an answer to xdotool which is arguably the bigger component. (I am aware of tools like ydotool and such, but AFAIK they're all significantly weaker; they can blindly inject emulated key/mouse events, but not, say, target specific windows)