Having lower productivity does not mean something is "unusable." It is, in fact, still usable. You just don't like it.
Maybe learn what unusable and hyperbole mean.
Having lower productivity does not mean something is "unusable." It is, in fact, still usable. You just don't like it.
Maybe learn what unusable and hyperbole mean.
What does this discussion gain from you being pedantic? Everyone with common sense knew what I meant.
> This type of hyperbole is what feeds the DE wars.
You not liking something is not the same as it not being "usable." You simply don't like it as much.
Your comment would be a lot less interesting if it were written without hyperbole. It would simply be "I don't like GNOME as much as KDE." And no one would really care about that, it wouldn't be a notable comment.
Go annoy someone else.
People who go around saying they "can't use GNOME" because it's "not customizable" without ever even trying would be the ones that are not appreciating all desktops, like an adult.
I have tried GNOME before, thanks for your assumption, so I know for a fact it's less customisable than Plasma. But less customisation doesn't equal less value anyways, so I don't even know what your point is.