Possibly, but Slootman had a personal brand from his book Amp it Up that came out recently. The book (which he wrote) obviously painted himself as a transformative executive, which I don't necessarily disbelieve. Personally, I thought the book was good though it advocates a sort of David Goggins-esque "Stay hard" approach to company culture, for better or worse.

He came out of retirement for this job, so the market certainly knew that his retirement was possible (although maybe not imminent).

These sorts of transitions take time, when you're the CEO of a $75B public company you typically don't up and quit because you see some bad news on the horizon. Especially not when you have such a stellar reputation and are already a billionaire. Slootman didn't need this job.

Snowflake also missed on guidance.

Could very well just be about Slootman retiring. He is considered one of the most savvy and aggressive tech ceos out there and is arguably impossible to truly replace.

Maybe, but Slootman is genuinely good at running this type of company and pushes people to do outstanding work. I've met a number of Snowflake people and they were uniformly excellent. The company knows how to hire well. That's something that comes from the top.

Not mentioned in the article but the retirement could be health-related--either him or a near relative. The numbers don't justify a quick CEO switch.