"Dune" and the delicate art of making fictional languages
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
The person who constructed the languages eschewed using the literary influences because he didn't believe that the phonemic inventory would be consistent over tens of thousands of years due to prior information that we have about diachronic change in language families.
What he fails to take into account is the fact that the wide availability of audiovisual distribution of language has a conservational effect that we've not really seen before. So for instance, while there is a large variety of English dialects in the US, "Broadcast English" and "General American" are quite stable and broadly available.
What they've done with the constructed languages of Dune would be like if they made a new Clockwork Orange movie without any of the Nadsat dialect. It robs something from the original text, all so a hobbyist can make something internally consistent that he's personally satisfied with and that may be marketed to future consumers. That sucks.
Before making claims about what he did or why he did, you should look him up. He too has degrees, but that shouldn’t make a difference. He’s created a wide variety of languages for many different projects, he founded the language creation society, and in general he gets extremely familiar with the source material for each project in which he’s involved. He’s not a huckster, and he definitely doesn’t focus on marketability of his work beyond his direct customer (though his customers may, but that ain’t on him).
What he is, is obsessed with a particular idea of how realistic the process of creating conlangs must be. And in what sense that process must be realistic. Instead of creating languages that please the audience, he creates languages that please the hardcore conlang community. I get it. As a language geek the results are pleasing.
As a Dune fan he did the book and fandom a great disservice and that sucks. He also made a crappy political choice to remove Arabic against the authors very clear intent which hides the true meaning of Dune. Sometimes realism makes something feel more real and tangible. But at other times it makes it feel pointlessly inaccessible. What's better? One kind of realism for language geeks or the integrity of the author's vision for the story? There's a clear answer for him.
You can only appreciate his work and his choices if you dig deep. And virtually no one does. Even hardcore fans.
There are also countless ways he could have justified keeping Arabic in. For example, by saying the Koran ensured that there would be little linguistic drift, or at least that the drift would have some limits to it. Just like say Hebrew. Or he could declare that it became a liturgical language like Latin or Vedic Sanskrit and so remained unchanged. But that's not language geek fun.
Also his example of Beowulf is, as someone who has published many papers and also taught linguistics, just stupid. That didn't happen to Hebrew or Greek or many other languages. English went through a massive lexicon, grammar, and pronounciation shift right after it. That was an abrupt non linear change in the language. In any case, with just a little practice you can read it far better than you might think.
It's also just false that words can't be observed long periods. Reconstructions of proto-indo-european show that very likely quite a few words hardly changd.
It's really sad that so many projects are picking only him, just like countless movies pick only a few musicians for their scores. The community is large and there are a lot of curious viewpoints and ideas out there.
To be fair, Frank Herbert wasn't his client here, the filmmakers were. Occam's razor suggests how the language turned out is in line with the filmmaker's intent.
That's even Frank Herbert's own justification in one of his appendices. Herbert seemed to have dabbled in conlangs a bit more than his contemporaries and put a lot of thought into it and picked the language smashes he did for thematic reasons, but with something of a semi-studious hobbyist eye for language drift. He detailed a lot of those notes in appendices. Given how much JRRT contributed to the conlang field in appendices, it seems surprising a conlang enthusiast would have missed some of the salient points in Herbert's appendices.
And, you know, the whole "galactic Islam" thing that's being glossed over.
Which is absolutely ridiculous given how much they've taken from MENA countries visually—the most shallow kind of appropriation when it comes to movies.
Ofcourse they were inspired by MENA people considering many of them live in the desert too with traces of tribalism and colonialism...
One mans "Cultural Appropriation" is another man's "Cultural Appreciation". I'm guessing you're just another Caucasian liberal living in Seattle or California who's acting insulted on behalf of MENA people?
I'm excited to see the movie—this is incredibly bland criticism compared to what other have to say about the movie. Still, if you love something, you're honest about it.
> One mans "Cultural Appropriation" is another man's "Cultural Appreciation".
Uh, sure, if you just want to throw the entire concept of discourse out the window.
The most devastating effect of the movement, was that most planets were largely governed by AI or less commonly cyborgs (cymeks). Rejection/Destruction of these machines left populations in utter chaos, from their managed state. Starvation, brutalism, etc. Imagine if any large country just stopped following a political and legal structure, eliminating anyone and anything who happened to support it. This was the cost of freeing humanity (according to the doctrine).
Another consideration is how suppressed previous knowledge was during the time the AI ruled over humans and how much was really lost during the Butlerian Jihad.
I'm not sure the Dune universe is fully elaborated from our days, but I would assume that every early human colony established by sleeper ships or embryo carriers would have a curated subset of human culture selected for maximising colony success. With that kind of redundancy, it'd be difficult to completely eradicate such information.
Is this true? I don’t think it is. Go watch or listen to some audiovisual records from not even a century ago, like a classic Hollywood film or one of the old WWII training films on YouTube for instance. If you listen for it, you will hear a dialectical drift.
Compare to Chinese, where dialects that separated a few hundred years ago are not mutually intelligible. I mean like, different Hakka dialects that arose two hundred years ago are not understandable to each other.
1800s English is Pride and Prejudice, Frankenstein, etc. Imagine the language changed so much you can't understand any of it
Standard Southern English and Standard American are mutually intelligible, modulo local slang
I'm not a linguist, but over any other four generations you'd surely expect to see a lot of this stuff change.
We've got...
* Non-rhotic dialect with "earnings" as [əjnɪŋz]
* Final /ɪ/ as in British English, not /i/ as in modern American English. "Country" is [k@ntrɪ].
* /p/ is clearly unaspirated
* "paid" is [pɛ:d], not [peɪd] as in modern American English
* "grant" is [grɑnt] not [grænt]
As another example, the Northern Cities vowel shift (for example "Chicago" pronounced [ʃɪkægo]) only really got going in the 1960s.
Again, I'm not saying there is no change at all, I'm saying this change is trivial when compared with language from people born c. 1750's. And that this seems to be reasonably due to the presence of audio recording technology.
If you want to focus on spoken language, as per the claims about sound recording, Simon Roper and Dr. Geoff Lindsay both have videos on YouTube about dialectical changes over time. My impression is that the difference between 1924 and 2024 seems about as big as the difference between 1824 and 1924, despite the invention of sound recording. And this is exactly what I would expect. I don’t think you could name ten pre-1940 films that most Americans have seen, for instance.
https://www.britannica.com/video/187707/David-Crystal-pronun... for how it would (probably) actually have sounded like. Pretty hard to understand!
Conversely, I don't think I know any Americans who haven't seen The Wizard of Oz (1939). And again with the sole exceptions of superficial idiom and vocabulary (and some really minor pronunciation changes that are as much theater affectation as they are language) there's absolutely no change at all from the stuff you hear from a 15 year old member of the High School class of 2027 (I live with one). Again, I really don't think that's normal historically.
And I mean...actually listen closely to these people's accents. You're really going to claim that there's "absolutely no change at all" between them and your teenager? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amclN9RG49c
I'm sure a lot of modern English speakers have a much better ability to comprehend dialogue in English Circa 1700 due to familiarity with Shakespeare than they would otherwise, but influencing modern usage is a very different thing.
Is today's equivalent of liturgical language. Those exist too, but aren't the primary medium of human communication.
Is this by any chance the 'clock' of phonetic change in a language, and its use in predicting what an ancient language may have sounded like? I.e. Proto Indo-European? I'm a total linguistics amateur but fascinated by the field and bits of knowledge I pick up.
We can observe in English that this sort of effect has happened with the advent of the printed word - I've certainly read before that Shakespeare effectively codified the English language, not just by giving us lots of words and sayings, but by causing a de-facto standardisation by becoming widespread.
And while the language has moved on since then, and added a multitude of new words and phrase, the structure appears to have moved more slowly than it did before this time.
> It robs something from the original text
Eh, it's a while since I've read the original text, but Villeneuve's adaptation of part 1 left me cold anyway. It's a shame, this might be the last big-budget attempt at making a Dune movie, but to me it was hollow and dead. So if they've changed the language the Fremen speak, it's one of the lesser flaws.
I do not think the original Dune books did not portray the jihad in a good way. It was the way that led Paul to triumph over the Imperator, but it was also the path, that lead him to burn worlds and establish a cruel theocracy. Which was only hinted at in the first books, but showed completely in Dune Messiah. Which is why many did not like it anymore as the glorious hero was dismantled.
"Basically, you can't have nice things because that's what it means to be human."
But I would disagree to this conclusion. I rather think his goal was (among many others) to show that you cannot have nice things, when your "heros" of the culture stand for glorious war. No matter if it was a "good war" at first.
How could one choose between a jihad (bad on short term) and the golden path (good on very long term)? Especially if the golden path requires nasty personal sacrifices?
Paul did not like the choices he had (understandable) but can't say he was clearly a hero or an anti-hero.
That's kind of the central question of the books, isn't it? Were the horrors along the way a justification of the ends? They certainly were horrors. They long term good was certainly the rationalization for much of the the horrors.
> Paul did not like the choices he had (understandable) but can't say he was clearly a hero or an anti-hero.
Paul took more of the selfish choices than not and still rationalized to a great deal that he was the hero. Irulan's slash fic of the both of them as great rulers together also didn't help but further rationalize Paul's villainous choices as "heroic" both in universe and for most readers of the early books.
But if timescale matters, and given timescale is such a crucial part of the series, it probably does: on the largest timescales offered by the series and the internal writers with the longest views of history it's almost always said that Paul was one of the worst villains of history. It's a heck of a rug pull, but it is absolutely an intentional rug pull in the series. It's fascinating what the series does with such unreliable narrators. (Among other things, rooting for the "hero white savior" who turns out to be the "genocidal villain" seemed certainly meant to allegorically give a lot of Americans reason to question American ethics in world politics, especially with regards to climate change.)
He became the godlike imperator and inquisitors in his name burned people for questioning his new religion. So yeah, the picture is mixed as Paul was not portrayed as someone who wanted this. But he still did it.
There was a quote in the book about the holocaust and how tiny the numbers were, compared to what Paul was responsible for. And speaking of, Hitler was also not proud of massacring children and women, but he thought this was something that needed to be done.
The difference is of course, that in Dune, there was the plot of the fixed fate and Pauls ability to clearly see the future to a certain point and him not really being able to change anything about it.
(But Hitler also thought he was choosen by god/fate)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belter_Creole
Translator here:
There's obvious practical reasons for all of this, but I wouldn't call it a "gold standard".
— Oh Stewardess, I speak Belter.
He's in great pain and wants to know if you can help.
— Tili natet 'ratna. Im gonya leta-kom *mediting
detim im bek fo du to gut.
I believe Tolkien's languages remain the "gold standard", but I'm not sure if they're as productive for everyday chat and memes.(I have heard that Eliezer Ben-Yehuda made a big mistake in not creating any swear words for Modern Hebrew, leading to a substantial overlap in comprehensible swearing between jewish and arabic communities in J'lem. That said, I understand "chinga tu madre ... cabrón" perfectly well, so probably any language communities in close contact will swear at each other perfectly comprehensibly whether they share a vocabulary or not)
The article is basically about Dune & Peterson, and the work he's done, especially for Dune. It's not too surprising they left off other popular conlangs.
One thing I absolutely loved about the first Dune movie was the incorporation of secret hand signals (covert sign language) from the book. The use of secret hand signal conveys the gravity and peril of the world they live in.
Yes, but Petersen worked on that one too.
Reading the book, I was surprised by the focus on mysticism and Islamic references, which were only a minor background element in the first movie. I do think the religious elements add depth to the story beyond the typical SciFi space opera and is a likely a strong contributing factor to Dune's enduring cultural impact. It's unfortunate the movies shied away from those references despite the potential consternation it may have stirred up.
For those that have recently read the book, this article by Harris Durrani on the probable influence of muslim theological development on Frank Herbert's Dune world is engrossing.
https://reactormag.com/the-muslimness-of-dune-a-close-readin...
Huh? Space opera was well established long before Dune[0]:
"Despite this seemingly early beginning, it was not until the late 1920s that the space opera proper began to appear regularly in pulp magazines such as Amazing Stories.[7]: 10–18 [16] In film, the genre probably began with the 1918 Danish film, Himmelskibet.[20] Unlike earlier stories of space adventure, which either related the invasion of Earth by extraterrestrials, or concentrated on the invention of a space vehicle by a genius inventor, pure space opera simply took space travel for granted (usually by setting the story in the far future), skipped the preliminaries, and launched straight into tales of derring-do among the stars. Early stories of this type include J. Schlossel's "Invaders from Outside" (Weird Tales, January 1925),[18] The Second Swarm (Amazing Stories Quarterly, spring 1928) and The Star Stealers (Weird Tales, February 1929), Ray Cummings' Tarrano the Conqueror (1925), and Edmond Hamilton's Across Space (1926) and Crashing Suns (Weird Tales, August–September 1928).[16] Similar stories by other writers followed through 1929 and 1930. By 1931, the space opera was well established as a major subgenre of science fiction.[citation needed]"
Tangentially, I also think the time gap between the third and fourth books (some 3,500 years) necessitated some more creativity with changes to the culture but I got the impression that the author still reused a lot of the same references despite the gap which felt kind of lazy, like humanity was just TOO stagnant for that long. That's when I started thinking that it must be a difficult endeavor to just invent a lot of new culture, especially when you've got to do service to the previous books in the series. The fifth book appears to follow the same trend despite another 1,500 years of time.
So in this case “language stood still” doesn’t seem particularly out of place.
Author copied pieces of various real world ones & they all interact and somehow it all makes sense.
If anyone came at me with a pitch involving Jesuits, Islamic jihadists and a revolution against AI I'd say that's going to get you incoherent gibberish...but somehow it works.
The actual book about the Butlerian Jihad on the other hand…
If someone in a Dune created a new kind of cookie, and a real baker had actually written a recipe for and baked said cookies, you wouldn't write the article "'Dune' and the Delicate Art of Making Fictional Cookies". You'd write the article "The Controversial Cookie from 'Dune'".
> I do object to calling them fictional languages.
https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/%22Neo-Chakobsa%22_(2020s_film_...
"The Apostropocalypse is to the current realignment in T’Rain what the Treaty of Versailles was to the Second World War,” said Richard, deliberately mocking the tone of a Wikipedia contributor in hopes that the others would get it."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imam_Shamil
And the book is _full_ of arabic, persian and russian terminology, and Islamic cultural and religious references, and the director and screenwriter have said that it's basically orientalism and ornament and they've gotten rid of it because it's distracting, but I don't think it's ornament, and I think the Islamic influences on the Fremen are a core part of the story, and it's missing a lot without it.
The book is meant to be about _our future_ and the fact that Muslims still exist and are important in the future isn't just like "flavor", it was an innovative idea at the time in science fiction and still is.
It just seems kind of wrong to expend so much thought inventing new languages for the movie when it had so much context and culture already there to use.
Did Herbert have a plan for this combo, or was he just making up some future backstory? Like sometimes happens when authors aren't really sure there will be a sequel at all, and just scatter some future references around.
Personally I read Dune in my first year of university, when I was doing a course on the Middle East, so it all hits very different to me, and the Arabic in Dune is very important to my personal appreciation of it - but I can see how it's hard to introduce to a contemporary audience due to all the regrettable events of recent decades, so perhaps it makes sense. It seems impossible to make neutral references to Muslim/Arabic culture or history these days, everything becomes some grand political statement for or against Bin Laden or Salman Rushdie...
The ones that come to mind for me are Dan Simmons, Walter Miller, and Philip K Dick. If you remember the Priest's Tale from Hyperion or Mercerism in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, you know what I'm talking about.
zen buddhism can reasonably be thought of as a mix between daoism and buddhism
pure land buddhism is basically christianity dressed in buddhist language
modern hinduism is full of buddhist elements
many central aspects of christian myth can be traced back to things like the resurrection of osiris
many christian practices such as monogamy and christmas are obvious continuations of roman pagan religious practices, and of course 'easter' was a northern european fertility goddess (though she isn't the origin of the festival with her name; the corresponding holiday is called some version of 'pesach', 'passover', in non-norse languages)
in many cases particular saints in syncretic catholicism in the new world can be identified with particular pre-conquest deities
islam is largely judaism, but has clearly integrated a lot of non-jewish cultural elements
and all of that is just in the last 2500 years! so it seems totally believable that in 26000 years things would be vastly more intertwingled
Islam is just Judaism? What? Christmas isn't pagan. That's a myth. Modern Christmas was invented by German Protestants and then spread to England where it was given a huge shot in the arm by Charles Dickens. You're wrong about Zen Buddhism.
Syncretism exists, but Herbert is just so lazy. He mashes together two different religions with very little in common other than Orientalism (his greatest vice as a creator).
But I do also grok what you're getting at- ultimately these trappings of religion are part of the medium of power, and covers up the base desires of humanity, even when it becomes transhuman through space spice-psychic magic. Herbert's elaborate spiritual systems then become manifestations of the culture under religion, but don't hold true moral or philosophical significance that religion is supposed to have, because the true moral reality in his setting is ultimately still about power.
I don't know, I haven't read the sequels, this interpretation might be really off-base.
In the later novels it introduces the concept of "Arafel" a word which comes from the Hebrew word for darkness. It represents the apocalypse (the end of humanity) and the idea is that through the golden path humanity is steered away from Arafel, so there is a thin veneer of a moral justification beyond power..
Agree, and those evocative references were one of things I loved when first reading the Dune series many years ago as well as watching the '84 film. I still remember being taken aback at the reference to "Emperor Hitler" and the fact that knowledge of him was (rightfully) lost with time, but also along with most other knowledge of our era.
Overall I think the topic of religion stays vague apart from Herbert making use of the trope of a Messiah and using syncretism as a symbol that major shifts happened in the human societies that brought opposing religions together.
It has been a very long time since I read all the novels so I can't recall all the details. It is a major plot point in book 5 "Heretics of Dune" zensunni leads to the alliance between the Bene Gesserit and the Tleilaxian's. The Tleilaxu follow a strict interpretation of the religion in secret and during a meeting between the faction leaders one of the reverend mothers is able to deduce this from their speech patterns and manipulate them into an alliance which has some ramifications.
Considering the Tleilaxu aren't introduced until book 2 (I think) I assume it was planned out ahead of time by Herbert.
We don’t see face dancers or high level negotiation with the Tleilaxu in book 1, that I agree with.
Even if you ignore the rather blunt stereotyping and selective aspects of Islamic cultures that Herbert injected. Or carried over from another story, as was highlighted earlier.
That's not to say the book isn't enjoyable, or even great. It's just that it mashes together various real people and historical incidents and draws much of its power from them. If you know the real story, it's impossible not to notice the parallels. If you remove the parallels, you lose the story's power.
Hydraulic despotism. The pitfalls of manipulating religion. The trap that both present to those who use them. That’s what most of the book is about.
If you just focus on historical analogies you’re missing some major themes of the book. And that’s ignoring the thematic exploration of precognition and omniscience, the ecological themes etc.
1. Colonisation and the relationship of colonisers and colonized.
2. Great leaders and what happens to them (explored further in Messiah and Children, with some really horrible consequences)
3. Environmentalism, feudalism, social stagnation, power structures, mutually assured destruction...
4. Exploration of a society that explicitly rejects thinking machines, in favor of using people as machines.
The proof is the movie version (at least Part I). The fremen feel less like an actual society with a coherent culture because they removed anything that tied them to the Middle Eastern.
I think this is true of fantasy in general, because the progenitor of the modern genre was Tolkien, a huge history/linguistics/mythology nerd. And one can easily argue that he set the precedent of taking history (often the middle ages) and imbuing it with the mythic/religious elements that people told stories about.
Look at GRRM and A Song of Ice and Fire. One of the subplots is basically, "What if Chinggis Khan was a chump who died but he had a blonde child bride that accomplished all the shit that he did in real life." Again, I don't think that makes his books bad, but in my experience, the more you study history, the more you realize how the real creativity of fantasy writers is what pieces of history and mythology they crib and recombine.
I've just seen the second film, and I think it does many of the book's messages justice (Great Man in particular). Perhaps you can criticize that removing the window dressing has destroyed some of the setting's cohesion. It's a reasonable argument.
But I do think that the film would lose more if was buttressed with an allegorical context for, uh, more recent world history.
Quick test: if the original didn't include them, would you notice and say "this story really lacks Arabic words to be great"? If not, it wasn't ever necessary.
also, i find the idea that arabic, one of the world's five most spoken languages, has shock value, to be shocking. we aren't talking about a conlang invented by the manson family
Moreover, distracting and off putting to whom? This article, in part, is responding to how distracting it is for fans of the books and readers to see the source material changed in a pretty crucial way. As others have said, its not exactly obvious to me that the use of these words and language are even possible to separate from the core story.
I get that this is a film executive's decision looking at the commercial viability of their product if they whitewash the story (or not), but at the end of the day we can't really say what the commercial success would (or wouldn't) have been if this language were preserved. To me this demonstrates more the entrenchment of the people who are in the position to make these choices rather than what audiences are willing to consume.
After all, consider the fact that Dune has remained important enough, despite the claim that Arabic (and specifically Muslim) imagery is used throughout that someone decided to greenlight two feature film adaptations so far.
Could you clarify what it is missing exactly? Genuinely curious as I read the books before watching the movie and I didn't really feel like the movie was missing anything?
> The book is meant to be about _our future_ and the fact that Muslims still exist and are important in the future isn't just like "flavor", it was an innovative idea at the time in science fiction and still is.
Respectfully I think this is reading too deep into it. Herbert borrowed Arabic words and concepts to build a hardy middle-eastern-adjacent culture, it's hardly the focus of the book.
https://reactormag.com/the-muslimness-of-dune-a-close-readin...
It's more than that.
Honestly I always thought the metaphor was borderline heavy handed, to the point that I never continued reading after the first book because the metaphor was boring to me
Now I feel positively gaslit. Did I imagine all this?
Dune was written in the 1950’s, but the geopolitical metaphors are a few decades older than that; the character of Paul Atreides is clearly a parallel to T.E. Lawrence, which places the geopolitical context firmly within the First World War. That’s a different part of the Middle East (the Levant as opposed to the Hejaz and Gulf), a different strategic value relating to long distance travel (the Suez Canal as opposed to oil), and a much older world of competing colonizers. And not to put too fine a point on it, the Ottomans also had a padishah emperor!
https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-produc... says that in 01960 the usa produced 8.11 million barrels of oil per day and consumed 9.80, with net imports of 1.61. (not sure what happened to the other 0.08.) net imports had grown dramatically over the previous decade, and oil was already a significant factor in usa political involvement in the middle east, in affairs such as the iranian coup. also, petroleum was a major strategic resource in the second world war; the usa's naval blockade against japanese oil imports is commonly cited as a major factor in japan's decision to attack the usa
by 01965 us net imports were up to 2.28 million barrels per day, so it was an issue of growing geopolitical importance, but still only a fraction of the importance opec and oil imports would have in the 01970s
But then note that Bene Tleilaxu is clearly not Latin, and makes more sense if you interpret the word "bene" ("bani") in its Arabic meaning - "descendants of", in practice often referring to tribes and similar groupings (as in Bani Quraish or Bani Isra'il) - Tleilax being their home planet. If we apply the same to "Bene Gesserit", it would mean "Daughters of ???". One possibility then would be Arabic "Jazirah", "peninsula".
An even more interesting theory along these lines is that "Gesserit" refers to the mythical demon-slaying hero-king Gesser (aka Geser aka Gesar) of the Mongolian and Tibetan folklore. In Mongolian, "... of Gesar" is "Geseriyn". Gesar is the Chosen Son of the Sky God (head of the pantheon), the first man who descended from Heaven to purge the world of evil demons that menace humanity - it sure does make for some interesting parallels with Kwizats Haderach...
Again, to re-iterate, it's entirely possible that all of these are simultaneously true. Herbert liked referencing obscure (to his culture) folklore, so a play on words like this could well be intentional.
It did all work great in the books, and would certainly have worked in the movies as well. But, the effort and care they've put into this additionally world-building seems totally in the spirit of the original Dune to me. There were a number of things that I had imagined differently when reading the books, but this was a rare case where I think they've done an excellent job bringing their version to the screen.
I honestly didn't notice. The Fremen still seem heavily middle eastern to me.
Well, given the history of the Iberian peninsula, there's likely a little more to it in Bardem's case...
note how the theme of the Nigun Shamil is echoed by cyberpunk computer cowboys:
> "For Case, who'd lived for the bodiless exultation of cyberspace, it was the Fall. In the bars he'd frequented as a cowboy hotshot, the elite stance involved a certain relaxed contempt for the flesh. The body was meat. Case fell into the prison of his own flesh." —WFG
Lagniappe: my current favourite music video performed by caucasians that references (however unintentionally) Lancaster vs York would be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTdXQabTTRg
but when i read parts of the torah like ספר שופטים, which are mostly about 2700–2800 years old, i don't see any of this fleshless and changeless or universally accessible stuff. people don't consecrate themselves or places by contemplating sacred truths, meditating until mystical revelations present themselves (though angels do make appearances), or experiencing bodiless exultation of any flavor. instead, the sacred is pursued through abstaining from pork, eccentric hairstyles, animal sacrifice, ornamentation with precious metals, carrying around wooden boxes, and spilling torrents of blood in the name of tribal deities; and it is manifested through victory in battle and material plenty. divine and sacred beings are conceptualized as partisan, constantly changing their opinions, and often even physically solid, though immortal; and alignment with them brings not liberation from the contemptible flesh but bestowal of victory and riches on that flesh. texts from that period from other cultures like the rig veda, the mahabharata, and the iliad agree on this, though the avesta may be an exception (there seems to be a significant amount of yearning after bodiless exultation in an afterlife after liberation from contemptible flesh in there)
even in the slightly older rig veda, where agni (for example) is described as undecaying/ageless and everywhere visible (an empirically valid description of the sun), and where mental attention to the gods is lauded often, what the worshippers are asking for is cattle, battle victories, and gold, not bodiless exultation and liberation from flesh, and their means for achieving it is singing songs, sacrificing food and drink, and performing rituals with their bodies
it's about 2500 years ago when we start to see people aspiring to bodiless exultation and liberation from flesh through mental contemplation of eternally absolute and changeless beauty, and we see it in two places: in the tipitaka and in platon, who apparently got it from the pythagoreans. in both places it's coupled with a belief in reincarnation, which, together with the close temporal coincidence, suggests a common historical origin. as for the divine beings of older books, shakyamuni apparently accepts that they are partisan, constantly changing their opinions, physically solid, but denies that they are immortal or worth worshipping, while platon takes the opposite tack, condemning the poets for describing them as partisan and constantly changing their opinions
so perhaps the current ran the other way: cyberpunk abacus and sand-table cowboys had humanity's first encounters with eternally absolute and changeless beauty, universally accessible but only through the mind, and the resulting bodiless exultation changed their outlook forever, and eventually everyone else's?
a great difficulty for this hypothesis is that the tipitaka doesn't contain, as far as i can tell, so much as the simplest seked calulation, much less theorems about angles and prime numbers
Now that's an interesting idea.
I need to check out the Avesta[0] and track down Platon's Nuptial Number[1] before commenting more, although some obvious replies to your difficulty are that accounting and scribing[2] have traditionally been priesting-adjacent, so there could well be more orally-transmitted relation than we have textual evidence for. (speaking of the latter: my hypothesis up until this point is that even ancient Sumerians had their own geeks who had their own analogies for abstraction, but the reason we now rest the abstract/concrete duality on Platon's broad shoulders is because he was in the first generation[3] who bothered to write their ideas down[4])
[0] although it seems like it took https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism#Manichaeism (after Mani 216–274) to really run with the material/spiritual distinction? (instead of good/evil)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato%27s_number
[2] the spoken word can certainly provide examples of object-attribute lattices that should bootstrap abstract thought, but maybe it was too closely related to our conscious processes for early human fish to notice the water? By the time one is making arbitrary marks for numbers, or even arbitrary clay blobs for numbers with units ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulla_(seal)#Origins ), it should become obvious that both {Bossy,Daisy,Buttercup} and {Cupcake,Ebony,Fiona} can be mapped to "3 cows". Literacy (where one stamps a number for 3 followed by a sign for cow into the clay) makes it even more obvious?
[3] compare Socrates' complaints about literacy, which remind me of our current arguments about LLMs: "but what if someone reads something which has just been hallucinated"?
[4] which might help explain your "and eventually everyone else's"; before writing, it would be difficult for a small fraction of geeks in a population to remain motivated, but after writing it would be possible for them to think "even if I know no one else from my village like me, there have been others, and there probably will be more..." and decide to participate in the literature?
The zoroastrian Ahuna Vairya and (especially) Ashem Vohu do seem to contrast following asha with worldly power. (compare med. {bellatores, laboratores, oratores} or PIE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trifunctional_hypothesis )
Given the relative dates, I'm proceeding with the very tentative hypothesis that Zoroaster (who does seem to comment, in stuff I have yet to read, on immortality?) might be the common source for both?
(oddly enough, the "silk road" as such is supposed to be more recent than all three, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road#Chinese_and_Central_... suggest many possibilities for bits to already have been travelling back and forth across eurasia even if trade in atoms had not reached its later heights)
As for the nuptial number: at this point I'm not convinced it isn't just technakos barbar (technobabble)? IIRC elsewhere in the Republic it's argued that the guardian class will reproduce by sending its youth to the ancient greek equivalent of open-air music festivals, where they will camp together letting nature (as with bulls and cows) run its course, so the passage here seems to be a deliberate contrast. (but to what end?)
Edit: think I found it, via source attribution. The speaker of those lines is neither Platon, nor Socrates (whom he supposedly quotes), but the Muses (as "quoted" by "Socrates"): http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... in which case technobabble makes perfect sense.
[at one point I ran across a Soviet book on religion —because a colleague had relied upon it in the 01960's to follow the Western CS literature and their use of Easter calculation as a running example— and was amazed at how much detail it went into on minor european sects but disappointed in how relatively broad its coverage was for other continents]
Edit: HN can express the sumerian signs for 3 and cow! 𒐈𒀖
I'm an idiot about the tipitaka: escaping samsara (or least loosening the fetters of maya) is kind of the point; eg https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39128233
> The earliest history of the native inhabitants of Arrakis indicates that they were the sole remnant of a people known as the Zensunni Wanderers, originally followers of a "prophet" named Maometh, circa 1381 E.G. The Fremen broke away from the main sect to establish their own religion based on an ultraconservative notion of living life according to "the ways of the fathers." Given the Fremen's roots in such a religion and the particularly life- threatening environment that Arrakis afforded them, the Fremen developed a set of cultural institutions unique in their perfect balance between the philosophical world view demanded by imposed Fremen faith and the harsh reality imposed by Arrakis's nature. These institutions remained stable for thousands of years and are significantly changed by only two events. The first was the arrival of Pardot Kynes as the first planetologist of Arrakis. The second was the transfer of the governance of Arrakis from the House Harkonnen to House Atreides in 10190 and the subsequent emergence of Paul Atreides as Paul Maud'Dib. Kynes expanded the cultures of the Fremen to include the hope for a second flowering of Arrakis; Paul Maud'Dib forever changed that culture, thus, for all intents, the ancient culture of the Fremen ceased with his rise to power.
And an example from first page of the section on Fremen Language: https://i.imgur.com/jiRQNVv.png and a bit from the history of the language: https://i.imgur.com/QQq5gfO.png
It wasn't until 7593 BG when I.V. Holtzman was born. 5022 BG was "The Empire of Ten Thousand Worlds".
The order of the mentats was established in 1234 AG. In 2800 AG you have the beginnings of the Zensunni Migration. 7193 AG was Zensunni on Rossak buying passage from the space guild to Arrakis.
Paul Atreides was born in 10175 AG.
---
FTL existed before the guild, it was mediated by computers and wasn't entirely safe.
There are about 10,000 years between the founding of the guild (and safe non-computer FTL) and the events of Dune.
---
A page from the start of the timeline of the Zensunni Wanderers history - https://i.imgur.com/Xw8qbpO.png
If you are interested in it, a number of sources have the pdf online which (as you can see from page numbers) isn't small.
Dune the novel, is where I learned the word "jihad" long before it was commonly known. It wasn't used in the film much, since as noted, the world has moved on.
I’m not sure how much Herbert differentiated Persian from Arabic culture —I don’t think he would conflate the two— but at the time of the Shah was seen as the most decadent ruler, independently of religion: in 1971, six years after the first book came out, he threw the biggest party ever (literally). I don’t know if Herbert approved of Salvator Dali as the Emperor in Jodorowsky’s version but that makes more sense to code him as excessive and dangerous because unpredictable (something Christopher Walken will do amazingly well; Jeff Goldblum could have been great too) than conflating him with Muslim references.
The references are beyond specific houses: Jihad is also used for the "Butlerian Jihad" which is started by the viceroy of the League of Noble, and a Harkonen ally, not something coded with the Freemen, who seemingly don’t know about it, or the Emperor who only takes over much later and at Harkonens’ expenses.
I think the studio (execs) just were afraid of having a blockbuster with a hero that promotes Jihad.
Agreed, they will use an different equivalent term such as "holy war" for the reasons given above.
The meaning of that fictional cataclysm is not casual, but the word choice in Dune the 1965 novel, using an unfamiliar middle-eastern term for it, I think was. These are separate things, and I refer you again to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use%E2%80%93mention_distinctio...
Dune has a hero? Paul is a hero?
Fun fact - a rock band from NZ named themselves "Shihad" after a member had read Dune and got the word jihad wrong. When they tried to break into the US market, they renamed themselves "Pacifier" because, well, you know, Shihad/jihad wasn't a great connotation post 9/11. And the name was appropriate because their music as Pacifier rather sucked.
It is a Persian word, but Herbert's use of it for the the Corrino emperor probably comes from its use in the Ottoman Empire.
https://arnoldkhan.medium.com/how-the-sabre-of-paradise-insp...
Speaking as a Russian, the only real reference to Russian specifically in the books is Vladimir Harkonnen's first name, which was amusing when it first came up, but it doesn't really seem to play any specific role (and ofc his last name is Finnish, so, like most other things in this universe, if it's a cultural reference, it's very syncretic). There is another reference to a broader Slavic culture in one of the Fremen chants in the first book, though:
ima trava okolo
i korenja okolo
This does not directly correspond to any existing Slavic language, but it is very recognizable to most speakers of such - "trava" is grass, "korenja" (pronounced as "korenya") are "roots", and "okolo" literally means "around" (from "kolo", circle), and in some Slavic languages became more generic "nearby". So the snippet should really translate as "grass is around/near, and roots are around/near", but Herbert translates it as "these are the grasses and these are the roots". Then again, many clearly Arabic phrases also have meanings that are similar but not exactly the same as what they really mean, and the book sort of implies that it's just the result of language evolution over time. But it is rather interesting that Fremen of all people apparently have some Slavic language as part of its history. Given that the snippet most closely resembles South Slavic languages, it is likely a reference to Bosniaks specifically, but it's never really elaborated further.It isn't, though between the time it was conceived and written and when it became popular things the world situation had evolved so that became a popular interpretation.
But, think of the alternative.
The Fremen are an 'extremist' religious group, that easily kill any foreigner, and are manipulated into a 'jihad'.
If the Movie doubled down to making them "Islamic Flavored". Then the movie and director would get crucified for portraying Muslims in an un-favorable light.
The book might have used Islamic Flavor, but it does not do it to show Islam favorably. It shows them as radical brutal desert dwellers.
I like the books and the first film, haven't seen part 2 yet. But this has to be bullshit. Is it about orientalist ornaments or did the studio want to avoid a midwit outrage over the frequent use of the term "Jihad"?
Just from memory, there was also the name "Usul" described as meaning "the strength at the base of the pillar". In the same context, I could see that drawing outrage too.
The book is meant to be about one possible future. It is explicitely not meant as a prediction how humanity will develope.
Dune and its follow up volumes are visionary fiction.
It’s not as if I enjoy my games with Russian in any less.
Make it look like Osama just going with the flow.
The Jihad in Dune had obvious parallels to the rise of the Rashidun Caliphate - previously unknown warriors appearing out of the desert and conquering most of the Roman Empire. So it was based in an era where the idea of holy war was quite different.
On top of that I think that the audience of SF literature are a little more open minded than the average movie goer.
The director omitted those things not as an artistic decision, but because of his and his group's modern political dogmas.