The larger it is, the longer it will stay hoovering and only slowly growing in size.
The larger it is, the longer it will stay hoovering and only slowly growing in size.
A city-sized asteroid wouldn't be more than a bright dot until the last seconds before entry, and at interstellar speeds it would take about three seconds to go from the vacuum of space to ground impact unless it had a very shallow vector.
also, seen by who/what? for the only known living things that could see it, it would be the last thing they did see. so maybe as far away as a couple of inches?
I love how they use this mechanic for storytelling in "The Expanse". The rebels of the belt threaten earth by slinging rocks at it at really high speed. Seems a very realistic way of interplanetary war. Why not bend some fast moving rocks to your enemy?
I decided to challenge the glorified-autocorrect machine with some more-manual napkin math, and I get 5.56×10^13 megatons, which is smaller by a factor of ~786x.
That discrepancy is too big to explain just in terms of asteroid composition: Even an impactor of pure Osmium would only be ~12x more energetic.
Here's my work, if anyone wants to check for errors:
Asteroid volume 1 km³
Asteroid density 1 2 grams / cm³ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_asteroid_physical_characteristics
Volume conversion 1E+15 cm³ / km³
Asteroid density 2 2E+15 grams / km3
Asteroid mass 2E+15 grams
Asteroid velocity 0.9 c
Relativistic kinetic energy 2.33E+29 joules https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/relativistic-ke
TNT energy 4.18E+03 joules/gram
TNT mass equivalent 1 5.56E+25 grams
Mass conversion 1.00E+12 grams per megaton
TNT mass equivalent 2 5.56E+13 megatonsHehe, I too love vacuuming.
Edit: added /s for those unable
I suppose you capitalise aspirin as well.