Yep. It's evidence that "AI" isn't automatically the saviour of Bing's search results, because in this instance it gets a pretty basic Google-able query (that an LLM can handle and be cajoled into handling correctly with enough RHLF) wrong. Google's "AI" results aren't much better at not being regularly wrong tbf.
All that will matter is that they're the only results, so no one can prove otherwise.
This has nothing to do with AI, the anecdote is from 2018.