Amazon lobbyists banned from EU Parliament
euobserver.com
euobserver.com
When lobbying is transparent, it actually loses quite a lot of its power. When lobbying is hidden, it becomes far more influential. Who would you trust more? Your favourite Green Party politician, who unbeknownst to you has been hired as an influencer for GroupA, or the slimy scumbag who works as a lobbyist for a GroupA?
However, "transparency" can also be nothing more than obfuscation, when its incomplete. After all, if your favourite politician is never forced to reveal that they are an influencer, but the slimy scumbag is forced to wear a fedora marking them "transparently" as a lobbyist...
Well, guess who wins again?
GroupA.
Not all lobbying is bad. And as has been mentioned here already, banning them will just make their influence and actions more hidden.
I don't know why you try to make an exception and claim that some lobbyists in Brussels are selflessly pushing for greener policies without trying to derive personal gains for themselves. I for one see plainly that there are millions of people who stand to lose, or already have lost, profits, jobs, entire livelihoods and others who profit enormously from those green policies of the EU. Did you hear anything about the recent farmers protest across Europe?
I don't know why you try to make an exception and claim that some oblivious farmers that are pushing againts greener policies in an attempt to derive personal gains for themselves are somehow in the right.
I for one see plainly that there are millions of people who stand to lose, or already have lost, profits, jobs and entire livelihoods from the ongoing crisis the world is experiencing, not to mention all those who profit enormously from keeping things as they are.
Have you heard anything about the ongoing climate catastrophe we are experiencing?
Seems EU politicians requested a hearing with Amazon about worker conditions which Amazon declined with the argument that it was short notice and that the hearing seemed to focus solely on Amazon despite the company consisting of less than 1% of the sector. They'd be happy to join if more companies, organizations or academics would be invited.
Apparently, politicians didn't like being turned down.
What a bullshit excuse. Amazon representatives represent 100% of Amazon, and answer for Amazon's labour practices.
This is the same company which a couple of years ago announced they adopted the "strive to be Earth's best employer" leadership principle, which starts to sound a lot like an abusive husband's claim they will strive to be the world's best husband.
Amazon is definitely going to run up against labor laws, but this is ridiculous; lobbying is an important part of the democratic process because it brings experts into the political process.
Unfortunately my employer spends more than enough on AWS to make up for it.
More discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39527379
2: if having an industry means all our companies are like amazon, a company I view as the closest equivalent to a sci-fi evil megacorp, then I'd rather not have an industry. The current attempts by eu are not to get money out of amazon, they attempts at increasing costs for amazon to continue being evil
2. You still don't get the reason why Amazon-like global "evil megacorp" exists is exactly because your government regulate your local business so much that you don't have ones to naturally compete with these behemoth. Your government is part of the reason a large portion of your IT talent end up working in these "evil megacorps".
3. If you did not see I am rooting for EU small or mid business, you are just looking for some "nice" words which I couldn't care less. Yes, reality just hurts, but so what.