Canadian 'online harms' bill to make online hate punishable up to life in prison
nationalpost.com
nationalpost.com
Discussion over here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39513092
This thread is about a different aspect of the bill which is about regulating and punishing non-harmful word based "offenses" by human persons.
It is trope in legislation that is good and required to try to sneak in sections that are damaging and not required so both have to be passed. That seems to be the case here. It is good for this to be highlighted to potentially improve the bill.
If not, then let me now state that I hate the authors of the bill.
If yes, then how does anyone know where the line is distinguishing what is and is not permitted?