Resurrecting loved ones as AI 'ghosts' could harm your mental health

You can't successfully fight the compulsion to "tell me how it is"? That's your choice.

You read me correctly. It speaks to a social issue for you if you don't see your writing style as aggressive if not your content impulse, to put it politely for now. I predict that you're aware of that propensity.

So that you don't further delude yourself and to inspire reflection, I would remind you that my post was made in the context of the article in question.

It was a personal anecdote. In the social-spirit of possibly assisting anyone else with self-aware assessment should they find themselves tempted toward extended periods of Ai generated stimulus. That is it.

Parallel to if I had commented, in a lightbulb forum, on the fact that a new technology of lightbulb induces migraine aura.

It wasn't an invitation to abruptly lend me your crackpot medical assessment nor a threat predicated on it, the latter in a weirdly intentional black-mirror screenwriting style.

The latter comment was couched to seem edgy and intimidating, rather than informative and social. Devoid of value other than shock factor and possibly "biofeedback" for you.

Reflect on the fact that a more normally adjusted person would have written that much differently, if absolutely compelled to deliver the message despite the context of the conversation.

You delivered medical information that you thought that you should. Inappropriate, but fine I suppose in isolation. Would a doctor, or even a research assistant, have then said "Welp. Grats. Enjoy being an involuntary research subject of a shadowy quasi-gov Intel operation"? What's wrong with you? Acknowledging that you weren't "being sarcastic", you have a problem.

I'll help. If you need to explain my theoretical exposure to being an involuntary research subject, which has historically been an alarming when not fatal position in which to be, then explain it in-full and in a style befitting an adult. Not in a style befitting a adolescent narcissist who gets off on trying to instill fear utilizing implication from incomplete information and name dropping.

The cognitive effects of subliminal patterns in Ai images "are going to be looked into"? You are good.

This research has to be mature for a long time now, if ongoing. Regardless, again, "no shit", who tf asked you, and what does it have to do with the conversation? Especially given the style of delivery?

"Own what" exactly, different from what I already owned by posting? Watch your straw-men.

I "owned" what was occuring by posting about it here, obviously having reflected on it.

At least to a degree that was enough to think to post it here before anyone else who may have noticed it. Before anyone who isn't self-aware enough to notice it.

You then flipped my disagreement about your specific medical characterization of my experience description into "not owning it".

You took this tack instead of silently accepting a simply stated disagreement on your assessment of the physiology of an anonymous stranger, by that stranger and after two paragraphs written by that stranger.

Or instead of accurately viewing your response as inappropriate to the conversation in the context of: how to evaluate and apply medical information (you have no information about my medical history), in the context of the language that I used when explaining my experience (I used the word "subtle" and you substituted "destabilizing"), and in terms of social norms (that I can dismiss but don't have to).

If I were an a-hole, for fun I could write an equivalent paragraph describing pathology targeting you and punctuated by the same conclusive threat. You know, just calling it like I see it. Solely on the analysis of your writing. Whether or not the clinical pathology and profile were actual, I'd wager that I could get uncomfortably close given Ai scanning of these threads. But I'm not an a-hole, nor do I get off on people thinking that I am superior via use of juvenile writing device.

Have a nice day.