Hacker News Reader

So in this thread we have one person claiming out of nowhere that one attack on underwater infrastructure is definitely a false flag, and you are claiming that another one is definitely not a false flag, all without a shred of evidence. How is this any better than just piping llm outputs directly to comment box? This sort of discussion is worthless.

View on HN

I find it quite interesting - these discussions show that underwater warfare is much more like cyber warfare than air/land/surface sea. Attribution is genuinely difficult.

Conclusive evidence is scarce. And to the extent it exists we're stuck with sources that aren't impartial.

Arguments about motives & rationality add some value, but they don't create broad consensus.

This would be claiming that it is a false flag:

The US blew up a Russian-German pipeline and then blamed Russia.

You should probably put this in quotes as OOP is disseminating russian propaganda.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com