Curiously enough, I had to observe the following to a friend just yesterday:
that a large number of people cannot count will impede Society, but will not impede Mathematics.
(But not so «curiously»: many people have a bewildering drive towards overusing 'we', hence notes like the above.)
"We" stands for a factually un-simple thing and is best avoided when, for example, it confuses collective work, group work, individual work. If "we have killed the planet" or "we have gone to the moon" have a constructive, productive sense in the context they are uttered, good, otherwise they are rationally meaningless.
That "a structured collective effort facilitated Feynman" is true, that "we achieved Feynman's results" makes sense only under some interpretations.
And when you meet "We have all set fire to national monuments" (Graham Chapman), well some of us have not. And when you meet "We were not so we could not", well that "we" is probably not universal.