Office buildings and housing blocks are designed differently.
The developer would likely want to remove alternate non load bearing floor|ceilings to optimise for automated farm tray stacking heights.
There are several modular designs that can be fitted into large open spaces ~two story clearance.
eg: https://www.foodmanufacture.co.uk/Article/2024/02/20/jones-f...
The questions then are why are V-Farms profitable in some locations and not others, where are the locations with cheap enough energy that can compete on local area transportation costs against salad and table vegetable farmers with higher transport issues, etc.
FWiW I agree that back fitting V-Farms into vacant "designed for office use" isn't likely to be profitable, they're better with (see link) open greenfield warehouse spaces with loading docks and a clean slate to optimise layout for tray handling, lifting machines, etc.
Ergo five V-Farms, of which three are likely profitable.
If you're going for low hanging snark at least learn to parse English and math a bit.
I like the low hanging snark joke, goes well with the subject matter at hand!
Edit: Just read the article. Nice PR piece for two vertical farm companies. All that articles contains is claims from the founders and their companies, nothing else. Could be ripped straight of the company websites. Also, 3.6 acres... that is nothing.
It certainly can be done - given many have been done, but it's not at all a given it'll be cheaper for all properties vs. tearing it down (which would still keep the utilities to the property, of course) and starting over.
To be honest, if these growing clubs could cover rent + electricity + water in my opinion it is not really that bad of an idea to take over empty office buildings, most legal cannabis is already grown in very controlled environments, open plan offices would be pretty good for it.