Hacker News Reader

I really don't consider this to be a gotcha. If you explicitly cast to type X, it isn't surprising to get back an object of type X, right? These aren't implicit type conversions a la the Javascript + operator

View on HN

It is if the object can't be meaningfully cast to the type. I'd expect to get an exception. That's why they exist.

For example, consider explicitly casting the string "abc" to an int. Python throws a ValueError. Ruby silently ignores the problem and gives 0. I consider the Ruby behavior to be a gotcha.

If you want to "explicitly cast" to an Integer only when the string strictly represents an int in Ruby you shouldn't be calling to_i. The Ruby behaviour is only a gotcha of you don't know the proper way of doing this in Ruby.

If you want an Integer or an exception you would call Integer(). If you want an Integer or nil, you would call Integer.try_convert(). If you call to_i, you're explicitly asking for a best-effort conversion, and shouldn't be surprised that's what you get.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com