The issue is just the opposite: the article is making a value judgment in the absence of objective data. I interpret the comment saying more info and less judgement please
the article offers multiple possible explanations for this and what their effects might be. it acknowledges those derivative outcomes are speculative.
Not once is a greening planet painted in a positive light in this article. Its as if the writer is afraid to say something positive about CO2 emissions.
This was done by the natural processes of the Earth, so recently even humans were alive during the Ice Age. Some scientists even say that we are due for another ice age, that we may be otherwise avoiding due to climate change.
Which is a quantitative statement. Altered conditions will not benefit every local species equally.
> Context matters