It’s nearly impossible to install their products without opting into layers of spyware and adware cloaked in dark patterns and requiring extraordinary measures to back out of hidden spyware installs done without permission. Microsoft has always been a fairly malignant business, built in shenanigans of various sorts, and as the market perfects new shenanigan vectors they’re right there pushing the envelope.
Automatic sample submission
Send sample files to Microsoft to help protect you and others from potential threats.
We'll prompt you if the file we need is likely to contain personal information.
Even if you're not an adversarial government leaning on it as a hacking enhancement, it's only a matter of time till governments worldwide demand certain controversial conversational topics be reported to law enforcement. I suspect the Knight Paladins of Anthropic would be more than eager to further this greater cause for the Safety of mankind.
From the start, since all but a few services are using your data to improve their models there is already no notion of privacy. The ethical ones will eventually (if not already) report suspicious activity (as determined by law) to law enforcement and the less ethical ones will report all activity to advertising and insurance agencies.
Some already lobby to ban opensource AI because enhancing the learning rate and reducing the friction of gaining new information for humanity without controlling oversight will also enhance hackers or other bad actors ability to access sanctioned knowledge. They consider this a heresy and deem humanity at large incapable of responsibly handling such increases in cognitive ability. Only a few Adept can be trusted with administering AI. Truly, spying is among the more trivial concerns for the future of computing, given AI's compute heaviness and the amount of centralizing control it engenders by default.
This is exactly how the OpenAI blog post reads between the lines: “We work with the government to make the world safe. Or else.”
https://openai.com/blog/disrupting-malicious-uses-of-ai-by-s...
The actual “bad” tasks “bad guys” performed were no different that what one can accomplish with Google searches. But no one talks about stopping terrorists to use Google.
This seems to violate all kinds of boundaries between your personal and professional life.
Most people as they mature learn how important boundaries are to health and well-being, as a child or teen growing up, as a partner, as a parent, and with friends and community.
People don't need this mess too.
There is no clear way to opt out of this, to create and maintain a boundary and to say no.
https://simeononsecurity.com/github/optimizing-and-hardening...
There’s also a lot of extensive details of the dark patterns in the installers where no means yes with the privacy preserving option hidden behind rolled up options etc. Even then you need to do other patches to avoid telemetry and data collection. Even then you end up with ads surfaced in the start menu, etc.