GenZ treat employers like bad dates 93% ghost interviews 87% don't show for work
finance.yahoo.com
finance.yahoo.com
The manufacturing industry I work in has a distinct lack of Gen Z applicants. Those that do apply tend to be 35+ and about half of them either don't show up for the interview or last about week and vanish. I work between three shops and there's a single Gen Z'er that I know of. He's someone's younger brother and seems temporary while he finishes school.
What none of these article authors seem to want to expose is how employers dug themselves into this situation by treating their workforce as a disposable commodity. If Gen Z is really ghosting as much as this article implies (for which I have seen zero evidence of in my Gen Z son and his friends, who all work) then I would question why Millennials and Gen X didn't do the same because let's face it; employers thinking we need them more than they need us is not a new problem by any stretch of the imagination.
Big "my bank says I can't afford $1200 a month for a mortgage so I pay $1750 a month in rent" energy
& ""ghosting"" employers is undoubtedly driven by the requirement to do lots of applications. You hear of people with hundreds of applications in flight; keeping track of them is a job in itself.
93% ghost interviewees, although I would say that the number that interview and have then started to lead on either myself or someone I know before ghosting is probably higher.
87% randomly terminate employees, not based upon performance.
Hopefully they are not surprised when they get treated with contempt, but apparently it's only about 30% on employers who recognise that they treat the workforce badly.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/google-lays-off-thousands-mor...
> No one is loyal to us anymore, boohoo
Indeed, trust goes both ways.
For those who think that's a bit excessive, consider the value of the cumulative time wasted by job applicants for positions that don't exist. If you embezzled that much money from your employer, it would be a felony. If an employer does it to job candidates, it's all honky-dory. It doesn't matter if the value to the employer was small, the value stolen was large.
(AI will of course make this worse on both sides)
Also it is a very bad faith argument to equate poor interviewing etiquette with theft of property.
Okay, so let's not decide that hiring managers should go on trial to prove the reason they didn't interview anyone for a job is not felony fraud but because they got busy, priorities changed, the right candidates didn't apply, they lost the budget for the position, etc. Morality about the power imbalance aside, it's wholly impractical to consider it punishable.
There are many benign reasons you might place a job ad and move on from it, just like you might get on a dating app and not respond to anyone. It sucks, but we the rejected can't be so fragile that we do anything but consider it a bummer and move on.
Oh no!
>..with 75% of workers
Wow!
>..saying they’ve ignored a prospective employer in the past year.
Oh.. who cares.
Well, not so much slaves to work, but get so little leeway from corporations that own us. It's not like we like it.
We need a shift in our relationship with employers and they will help us.
Newsflash: boomers treating everyone with complete contempt and disregard get feelings hurt when treated the way they treat others. Boo fucking hoo.
That was Boomers complaining. These days, the majority of Boomers have reached state pension age, so they're probably not part of this specific issue.